From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Berg Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] context tracking updates Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 01:15:46 +0200 Message-ID: <1212102946.10109.16.camel@johannes.berg> References: <20080529085402.814224000@sipsolutions.net> <1212100516.28403.152.camel@brick> (sfid-20080530_003519_648056_2583259D) <1212101102.10109.5.camel@johannes.berg> <1212101465.28403.156.camel@brick> (sfid-20080530_005109_203270_E4619B0E) <1212101645.10109.7.camel@johannes.berg> <1212102199.4265.46.camel@dv> <1212102414.10109.11.camel@johannes.berg> (sfid-20080530_010810_225034_159FE69C) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-r/YyCLMEHqaodRrcDXsO" Return-path: Received: from xc.sipsolutions.net ([83.246.72.84]:36513 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751183AbYE2XQz (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 19:16:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1212102414.10109.11.camel@johannes.berg> (sfid-20080530_010810_225034_159FE69C) Sender: linux-sparse-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org To: Pavel Roskin Cc: Harvey Harrison , Josh Triplett , Philipp Reisner , linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org --=-r/YyCLMEHqaodRrcDXsO Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 01:06 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 19:03 -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 00:54 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > > > What sort? Right now, it seems to go into a dead loop on > > > > > fs/minix/itree_v1.c for me?! > > > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > > > It's a problem introduced with 9/9 explicitly checking inlines. > > >=20 > > > Cool, thanks, I'm just looking at it. > >=20 > > You may want to look at this: > > http://marc.info/?t=3D120287346100007&r=3D1&w=3D2 > > http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-sparse&m=3D120370800715845&w=3D2 > >=20 > > It was happening in ndiswrapper because a typedef was forcing an inline > > function to be linearized twice. >=20 > Ah, thanks for the pointers, that might be the case. Wonder why it's > being linearized twice, and I see it even without the linearization I > force...? will take a look tomorrow. No, I'm just confused. That updated patch fixes it for me. johannes --=-r/YyCLMEHqaodRrcDXsO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iQIVAwUASD85IaVg1VMiehFYAQJqTBAAnAUX3Vri2UmkptmhQUc7A5CD8HC3wcqX ZG129oLsynfW2+XZVPW9NhbSzDrCz4q8txZR/vNsMrMAdJWL8lMsZagYH6R+ob/L qSZUGsj9yiWrl6cx6KWwy7GOc2PeqLLNmdv5R8/EuUQXHuUiYIw5jUI2KvmxLp+s /LcpHw5M32tK/PcjmOCHtcJwWQb0TGNvlTIlNlfKe5OSeYS/s31G4G/yJOO5kYmq 63Q6DKNhnlKq94pHzkN/wHsBtcKQBBoqEsnM04HeAK8kExxsVRkm2JfnkuCtPgSU 1tT5l50XCvnjRuA0LJWu7+kYWzGmeASgWGfbqjqw0nEpXeesFoqNVAOX3RCnhcnu +ffrxKdO1P3VaEPV6J2RUZzNsIC3sxNeAJstnwLapE5cJnyR2cPwymAR+4MQ9pi0 jDSvhDg6Nlkv/GG1v9vVBdcI1E+Zto1rIwx9EPMQ0cLo9+Owm9QAp6z+Ed30e4Zr gZ9r5HmL7DXMnV0cp96tJ+tpi62mPoFzlgsqOQk/ViZgivCiVmBtsbXi35ebrOUn A0QzYe1Mi+yojfEBuv7O3hJcKbjIYKwvh+rYKqPXnRVW4aRHPptlk/URyueUilsp J3olYa2JN6QSHSf74Shw8IN3mJDL5pJ5iPZW68auid2f4/EoRSIg2hnUreCoMxNY ytVhHl9ivPY= =3MIu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-r/YyCLMEHqaodRrcDXsO--