From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Josh Triplett Subject: Re: Updated byte size patch Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 11:02:50 -0700 Message-ID: <1215453770.3003.32.camel@josh-work.beaverton.ibm.com> References: <487019DF.10907@cowlark.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from e6.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.146]:40608 "EHLO e6.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754209AbYGGSDA (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2008 14:03:00 -0400 Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e6.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m67I5JnL007771 for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 14:05:19 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.0) with ESMTP id m67I2nCq183168 for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 14:02:49 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m67I2moO017285 for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 14:02:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: <487019DF.10907@cowlark.com> Sender: linux-sparse-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org To: David Given Cc: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 02:03 +0100, David Given wrote: > Turns out that I'd missed one place where there was a hardcoded 8 in the > last patch, so here's an updated version. I do still have some concerns about the potential performance loss, but it seems unlikely to cause a serious problem. I have *serious* doubts that Sparse will ever successfully handle a system without 8-bit bytes. However, I will merge this patch. I do need a signoff, though. - Josh Triplett