linux-sparse.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* some newbie questions about __attribute__((context,...))
@ 2008-07-19 11:49 Robert P. J. Day
  2008-07-19 12:42 ` Johannes Berg
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2008-07-19 11:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sparse mailing list


  (if there's a good writeup on this, or a previous mailing post
explaining this, a pointer to that will do just fine.)

  i'm trying to understand how this context checking is actually done
by sparse.  from the sparse man page:

"Functions with the extended attribute
__attribute__((context(expression,in_context,out_context)) require the
context expression (for instance, a lock) to have the value in_context
(a constant nonnegative integer) when called, and return with the
value out_context (a constant nonnegative integer)."

  fair enough, but what are the possibilities for that "expression"
and what exactly is being compared to the values of 0 or 1?  sure, a
lock is an obvious candidate, but you can't really simply be comparing
the value of a lock to 0 or 1 -- a lock is a *structure* which doesn't
have a simple value of 0 or 1.

  so, to try to keep things simple, what is happening in the
background with code like this:

=====
static void *aarp_seq_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos)
        __acquires(aarp_lock)
{
        struct aarp_iter_state *iter = seq->private;

        read_lock_bh(&aarp_lock);
        iter->table     = resolved;
        iter->bucket    = 0;

        return *pos ? iter_next(iter, pos) : SEQ_START_TOKEN;
}
=====

  and how is that call to read_lock_bh() changing the "context" value
of the object aarp_lock?  thanks for any enlightenment.

rday
--


========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry:
    Have classroom, will lecture.

http://crashcourse.ca                          Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
========================================================================

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: some newbie questions about __attribute__((context,...))
  2008-07-19 11:49 some newbie questions about __attribute__((context,...)) Robert P. J. Day
@ 2008-07-19 12:42 ` Johannes Berg
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Berg @ 2008-07-19 12:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Robert P. J. Day; +Cc: Sparse mailing list

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2224 bytes --]


> "Functions with the extended attribute
> __attribute__((context(expression,in_context,out_context)) require the
> context expression (for instance, a lock) to have the value in_context
> (a constant nonnegative integer) when called, and return with the
> value out_context (a constant nonnegative integer)."
> 
>   fair enough, but what are the possibilities for that "expression"

None. It's currently mostly ignored. I posted patches to fix this, which
had problems, and the fixes to those patches haven't been merged yet.

With my patches, the possibilities are either an expression that sparse
can resolve, e.g.

void do_lock(void *lock) __attribute__((context(lock,0,1))) {...}

or for compatibility anything else that is then treated as a constant:

void do_lock(void) __attribute__((context(GLOBAL_LOCK,0,1))) {...}

> and what exactly is being compared to the values of 0 or 1?  sure, a
> lock is an obvious candidate, but you can't really simply be comparing
> the value of a lock to 0 or 1 -- a lock is a *structure* which doesn't
> have a simple value of 0 or 1.

Sparse internally tracks the "value" of such a context. My examples
above would increase the context in the function, and every time that
function is called the context is increased, and if such a context is
"leaked" then sparse will complain it isn't 0.

> static void *aarp_seq_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos)
>         __acquires(aarp_lock)
> {
>         struct aarp_iter_state *iter = seq->private;
> 
>         read_lock_bh(&aarp_lock);
>         iter->table     = resolved;
>         iter->bucket    = 0;
> 
>         return *pos ? iter_next(iter, pos) : SEQ_START_TOKEN;
> }
> =====
> 
>   and how is that call to read_lock_bh() changing the "context" value
> of the object aarp_lock?  thanks for any enlightenment.

Well, read_lock_bh() acquires the context named "aarp_lock", and
aarp_seq_start is annotated to also do that. If you write

void foo()
{
	read_lock_bh(&aarp_lock);
}

then sparse will complain that the context is leaked in foo.

If you really want to do any serious work with sparse's context tracking
I can only suggest to apply my patches.

johannes

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-07-19 12:42 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-07-19 11:49 some newbie questions about __attribute__((context,...)) Robert P. J. Day
2008-07-19 12:42 ` Johannes Berg

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).