From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pekka Enberg Subject: Re: suggestion for Merging LLVM Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 22:29:42 +0200 Message-ID: <1323808182.1428.309.camel@jaguar> References: <4ECB38B1.8020803@garzik.org> <1321941674.1428.124.camel@jaguar> <4ECEFC7E.5060905@garzik.org> <1322200349.1428.127.camel@jaguar> <4ECFD5C9.20702@garzik.org> <4ECFF825.2010906@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from filtteri2.pp.htv.fi ([213.243.153.185]:50934 "EHLO filtteri2.pp.htv.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750786Ab1LMU3p (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:29:45 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-sparse-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org To: Christopher Li Cc: Jeff Garzik , Linus Torvalds , Linux-Sparse On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > According to http://llvm.org/ the release date for 3.0 is November 30, > > downgrading due to impatience. If Pekka wants to get it going on 2.x I've > > no objection, but I am lazy and see no reason to do any extra work with 3.0 > > release so close. On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 12:30 -0800, Christopher Li wrote: > I will take a look how hard it is hard to support llvm 2.9. Don't know when the > 3.0 will be available in Fedora. Ping? LLVM 3.0 is out now officially.