From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
To: sparse@chrisli.org, linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org
Cc: will.deacon@arm.com, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] sparse: treat function pointers as pointers to const data
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2014 14:36:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1410093413-3075-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> (raw)
This code snippet:
static void bar(void const *arg)
{
int (*foo)(void) = arg;
}
produces the following warning:
test.c:4:28: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different modifiers)
test.c:4:28: expected int ( *foo )( ... )
test.c:4:28: got void const *arg
which is caused by the fact that the function pointer 'foo' is not annotated
as being a pointer to const data. However, dereferencing a function pointer
does not produce an lvalue, so a function pointer points to const data by
definition, and we should treat it accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
---
OK, so while my v1 did solve the example case, it turns out universally treating
function pointers as pointers to const data produces so much fallout that it
does more harm than good.
Instead, this v2 only addresses function pointer initializers and assignments.
--
Ard.
evaluate.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/evaluate.c b/evaluate.c
index 66556150ddac..a5a830978bda 100644
--- a/evaluate.c
+++ b/evaluate.c
@@ -1359,6 +1359,15 @@ static int compatible_assignment_types(struct expression *expr, struct symbol *t
typediff = "different address spaces";
goto Err;
}
+ /*
+ * If this is a function pointer assignment, it is
+ * actually fine to assign a pointer to const data to
+ * it, as a function pointer points to const data
+ * implicitly, i.e., dereferencing it does not produce
+ * an lvalue.
+ */
+ if (b1->type == SYM_FN)
+ mod1 |= MOD_CONST;
if (mod2 & ~mod1) {
typediff = "different modifiers";
goto Err;
--
1.8.3.2
next reply other threads:[~2014-09-07 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-07 12:36 Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2014-09-07 17:14 ` [PATCH v2] sparse: treat function pointers as pointers to const data Josh Triplett
2014-09-07 17:29 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1410093413-3075-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--to=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sparse@chrisli.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox