Hi,

> Yep that's cargo-culted, but from a quick grep only msm and qxl
> headers do this (the other __user annotations in uapi/drm are for
> pointers, where it's correct). Adding those maintainers.

Yep, those looks pointless indeed.

> Also, if you use u64_to_user_ptr helper macro sparse should have
> caught this (if not we'd need to improve the macro).

And qxl should actually use it.

Fix attached (compile-tested only so far), does that look ok?

cheers,
  Gerd