linux-sparse.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christopher Li <sparse@chrisli.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Yura Pakhuchiy <pakhuchiy@gmail.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@freedesktop.org>,
	linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Re: sparse handles int64_t type wrong
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:21:04 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061214042104.GB20494@chrisli.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0612131657300.5718@woody.osdl.org>

Never mind my previous patch. It is too simple and wrong.
It can't really tell the C type is abstract or not because
int_ctype has base_type to int_type as well. It ends up applying
the modifiers to int_ctype.

You are right about it is very nasty to delay the finalization
of the C type. Back to drawing board.

Chris

On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 04:57:59PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> 
> On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Christopher Li wrote:
> > 
> > Do you mean some thing like this?  I might leave some abstract ctype
> > in the tree, it is hard to find all all the user of ctype before
> > it get finalized.  It seems work with the test case in my hand.
> 
> Yes, this is I think the proper way to do it. 
> 
> 		Linus

      reply	other threads:[~2006-12-14  4:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-12-12 19:34 sparse handles int64_t type wrong Yura Pakhuchiy
2006-12-12 19:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-12 19:50   ` Yura Pakhuchiy
2006-12-12 20:02   ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-12 20:25     ` Yura Pakhuchiy
2006-12-13  5:18     ` [PATCH][RFC] " Christopher Li
2006-12-13 15:36       ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-14  0:13         ` Christopher Li
2006-12-14  0:57           ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-14  4:21             ` Christopher Li [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061214042104.GB20494@chrisli.org \
    --to=sparse@chrisli.org \
    --cc=josh@freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pakhuchiy@gmail.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).