* Re: [PATCH][take II] Re: sparse handles int64_t type wrong
@ 2006-12-15 4:52 Christopher Li
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Christopher Li @ 2006-12-15 4:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds; +Cc: Yura Pakhuchiy, Josh Triplett, linux-sparse
Another attempt to fix the attribute parsing.
This patch delay the finalized of the abstract int type so it
can take the __attribute__ in the end of declaration.
It complicate the bit field parsing because the abstract type can
show up in the base type of bit field.
It assume in the finalize stage the modifier only apply to the
simple base type. In the case like:
int (*fn)(void) __attribute__(x);
If the attribute x need to handle in finalize stage, it need
to extend the while loop in apply_modifiers()
Signed-off-by: Christopher Li <sparse@chrisli.org>
Index: sparse/parse.c
===================================================================
--- sparse.orig/parse.c 2006-12-14 20:26:32.000000000 -0800
+++ sparse/parse.c 2006-12-14 20:27:44.000000000 -0800
@@ -70,6 +70,50 @@ struct statement *alloc_statement(struct
static struct token *struct_declaration_list(struct token *token, struct symbol_list **list);
+static int apply_modifiers(struct position pos, struct ctype *ctype)
+{
+ struct symbol *base;
+
+ while ((base = ctype->base_type)) {
+ switch (base->type) {
+ case SYM_FN:
+ case SYM_ENUM:
+ case SYM_ARRAY:
+ case SYM_BITFIELD:
+ case SYM_PTR:
+ ctype = &base->ctype;
+ continue;
+ }
+ break;
+ }
+
+ /* Turn the "virtual types" into real types with real sizes etc */
+ if (ctype->base_type == &int_type) {
+ ctype->base_type = ctype_integer(ctype->modifiers);
+ ctype->modifiers &= ~MOD_SPECIFIER;
+ } else if (ctype->base_type == &fp_type) {
+ ctype->base_type = ctype_fp(ctype->modifiers);
+ ctype->modifiers &= ~MOD_SPECIFIER;
+ }
+
+ if (ctype->modifiers & MOD_BITWISE) {
+ struct symbol *type;
+ ctype->modifiers &= ~(MOD_BITWISE | MOD_SPECIFIER);
+ if (!is_int_type(ctype->base_type)) {
+ sparse_error(pos, "invalid modifier");
+ return 1;
+ }
+ type = alloc_symbol(pos, SYM_BASETYPE);
+ *type = *ctype->base_type;
+ type->ctype.base_type = ctype->base_type;
+ type->type = SYM_RESTRICT;
+ type->ctype.modifiers &= ~MOD_SPECIFIER;
+ ctype->base_type = type;
+ create_fouled(type);
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
static struct symbol * indirect(struct position pos, struct ctype *ctype, int type)
{
struct symbol *sym = alloc_symbol(pos, type);
@@ -724,7 +768,6 @@ static void check_modifiers(struct posit
modifier_string (wrong));
}
-
static struct token *declaration_specifiers(struct token *next, struct ctype *ctype, int qual)
{
struct token *token;
@@ -778,7 +821,6 @@ static struct token *declaration_specifi
apply_ctype(token->pos, &thistype, ctype);
}
- /* Turn the "virtual types" into real types with real sizes etc */
if (!ctype->base_type) {
struct symbol *base = &incomplete_ctype;
@@ -791,28 +833,6 @@ static struct token *declaration_specifi
base = &int_type;
ctype->base_type = base;
}
- if (ctype->base_type == &int_type) {
- ctype->base_type = ctype_integer(ctype->modifiers);
- ctype->modifiers &= ~MOD_SPECIFIER;
- } else if (ctype->base_type == &fp_type) {
- ctype->base_type = ctype_fp(ctype->modifiers);
- ctype->modifiers &= ~MOD_SPECIFIER;
- }
- if (ctype->modifiers & MOD_BITWISE) {
- struct symbol *type;
- ctype->modifiers &= ~(MOD_BITWISE | MOD_SPECIFIER);
- if (!is_int_type(ctype->base_type)) {
- sparse_error(token->pos, "invalid modifier");
- return token;
- }
- type = alloc_symbol(token->pos, SYM_BASETYPE);
- *type = *ctype->base_type;
- type->ctype.base_type = ctype->base_type;
- type->type = SYM_RESTRICT;
- type->ctype.modifiers &= ~MOD_SPECIFIER;
- ctype->base_type = type;
- create_fouled(type);
- }
return token;
}
@@ -947,7 +967,7 @@ static struct token *handle_bitfield(str
struct symbol *bitfield;
long long width;
- if (!is_int_type(ctype->base_type)) {
+ if (ctype->base_type != &int_type && !is_int_type(ctype->base_type)) {
sparse_error(token->pos, "invalid bitfield specifier for type %s.",
show_typename(ctype->base_type));
// Parse this to recover gracefully.
@@ -968,15 +988,16 @@ static struct token *handle_bitfield(str
width = -1;
} else if (decl->ident) {
struct symbol *base_type = bitfield->ctype.base_type;
- int is_signed = !(base_type->ctype.modifiers & MOD_UNSIGNED);
+ struct symbol *bitfield_type = base_type == &int_type ? bitfield : base_type;
+ int is_signed = !(bitfield_type->ctype.modifiers & MOD_UNSIGNED);
if (Wone_bit_signed_bitfield && width == 1 && is_signed) {
// Valid values are either {-1;0} or {0}, depending on integer
// representation. The latter makes for very efficient code...
sparse_error(token->pos, "dubious one-bit signed bitfield");
}
if (Wdefault_bitfield_sign &&
- base_type->type != SYM_ENUM &&
- !(base_type->ctype.modifiers & MOD_EXPLICITLY_SIGNED) &&
+ bitfield_type->type != SYM_ENUM &&
+ !(bitfield_type->ctype.modifiers & MOD_EXPLICITLY_SIGNED) &&
is_signed) {
// The sign of bitfields is unspecified by default.
sparse_error(token->pos, "dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned'");
@@ -1001,6 +1022,7 @@ static struct token *declaration_list(st
token = handle_bitfield(token, decl);
token = handle_attributes(token, &decl->ctype);
}
+ apply_modifiers(token->pos, &decl->ctype);
add_symbol(list, decl);
if (!match_op(token, ','))
break;
@@ -1034,6 +1056,7 @@ static struct token *parameter_declarati
*tree = sym;
token = declarator(token, sym, &ident);
sym->ident = ident;
+ apply_modifiers(token->pos, &sym->ctype);
return token;
}
@@ -1042,7 +1065,9 @@ struct token *typename(struct token *tok
struct symbol *sym = alloc_symbol(token->pos, SYM_NODE);
*p = sym;
token = declaration_specifiers(token, &sym->ctype, 0);
- return declarator(token, sym, NULL);
+ token = declarator(token, sym, NULL);
+ apply_modifiers(token->pos, &sym->ctype);
+ return token;
}
static struct token *expression_statement(struct token *token, struct expression **tree)
@@ -1770,6 +1795,7 @@ struct token *external_declaration(struc
decl = alloc_symbol(token->pos, SYM_NODE);
decl->ctype = ctype;
token = declarator(token, decl, &ident);
+ apply_modifiers(token->pos, &decl->ctype);
/* Just a type declaration? */
if (!ident)
@@ -1830,6 +1856,7 @@ struct token *external_declaration(struc
decl->ctype = ctype;
token = declaration_specifiers(token, &decl->ctype, 1);
token = declarator(token, decl, &ident);
+ apply_modifiers(token->pos, &decl->ctype);
if (!ident) {
sparse_error(token->pos, "expected identifier name in type definition");
return token;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2006-12-15 5:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-12-15 4:52 [PATCH][take II] Re: sparse handles int64_t type wrong Christopher Li
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).