From: Christopher Li <sparse@chrisli.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Cc: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Re: error, types differ in signedness
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 12:06:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070205200617.GA14964@chrisli.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070205105420.6f19a57d.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 10:54:20AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> The skbuff.[hc] difference is in *getfrag vs. getfrag.
> The mpage.[hc] difference is in *get_block vs. getblock.
>
> Questions:
> 1. Is the warning valid?
I don't think so.
> 2. Isn't the '*' unnecessary?
It is valid in C without '*'. Sparse already know the function
is going to degenerated into function pointers. It wrongly inherent
the signedness. You get a signed pointer.
Can you please try this patch?
Chris
Index: sparse/symbol.h
===================================================================
--- sparse.orig/symbol.h 2007-02-04 23:46:07.000000000 -0800
+++ sparse/symbol.h 2007-02-05 12:18:30.000000000 -0800
@@ -191,6 +191,7 @@ struct symbol {
#define MOD_SIZE (MOD_CHAR | MOD_SHORT | MOD_LONG | MOD_LONGLONG)
#define MOD_IGNORE (MOD_TOPLEVEL | MOD_STORAGE | MOD_ADDRESSABLE | \
MOD_ASSIGNED | MOD_USERTYPE | MOD_FORCE | MOD_ACCESSED | MOD_EXPLICITLY_SIGNED)
+#define MOD_PTRINHERIT (MOD_VOLATILE | MOD_CONST | MOD_NODEREF | MOD_STORAGE)
/* Current parsing/evaluation function */
Index: sparse/evaluate.c
===================================================================
--- sparse.orig/evaluate.c 2007-02-04 00:47:46.000000000 -0800
+++ sparse/evaluate.c 2007-02-05 12:20:08.000000000 -0800
@@ -1282,7 +1282,7 @@ static void examine_fn_arguments(struct
else
ptr->ctype.base_type = arg;
ptr->ctype.as |= s->ctype.as;
- ptr->ctype.modifiers |= s->ctype.modifiers;
+ ptr->ctype.modifiers |= s->ctype.modifiers & MOD_PTRINHERIT;
s->ctype.base_type = ptr;
s->ctype.as = 0;
@@ -1313,8 +1313,6 @@ static struct symbol *convert_to_as_mod(
return sym;
}
-#define MOD_PTRINHERIT (MOD_VOLATILE | MOD_CONST | MOD_NODEREF | MOD_STORAGE)
-
static struct symbol *create_pointer(struct expression *expr, struct symbol *sym, int degenerate)
{
struct symbol *node = alloc_symbol(expr->pos, SYM_NODE);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-05 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-05 18:54 error, types differ in signedness Randy Dunlap
2007-02-05 20:06 ` Christopher Li [this message]
2007-02-05 21:04 ` [PATCH] " Randy Dunlap
2007-02-05 22:27 ` Pavel Roskin
2007-02-06 0:16 ` Christopher Li
2007-02-06 1:12 ` Pavel Roskin
2007-02-06 18:36 ` Christopher Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070205200617.GA14964@chrisli.org \
--to=sparse@chrisli.org \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).