From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: sparse segfault on ppc64. Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 11:56:51 -0400 Message-ID: <20070322155651.GG15364@redhat.com> References: <20070322063600.GD15364@redhat.com> <20070322073344.GU4095@ftp.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:42317 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933510AbXCVP5U (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Mar 2007 11:57:20 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070322073344.GU4095@ftp.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-sparse-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org To: Al Viro Cc: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 07:33:44AM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 02:36:00AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > > Is this something new, or am I the first person dumb enough to try and > > run sparse on non-x86 ? > > Segfault is new (which version?); 0.2 Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk