From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 21:38:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070624203837.GE21478@ftp.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1a25667a20e43a072f733a3ec2b8e79d@kernel.crashing.org>
On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 09:40:06PM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >>Why? I'd say it's not better than BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO() use
> >>instead of that ?:
> >
> >Oh, _that_ part I have no problem with. It's more that it seems that
> >the
> >gcc optimization is ok at least as an extension.
>
> Sure, but it's not an extension (yet), but an implementation
> side-effect; it would have to be (semi-formally) defined in
> the manual to be an extension. Until that happens, anyone
> using this "feature" risks haven his code broken at any time
> (or, rather, his code already was broken but he didn't know
> it).
>
> See gcc.gnu.org/PR456 for more discussion. Yes it's an old
> bug...
Humm... Right, so __builtin_offsetof() needs special treatment too.
Oh, bugger. Is
offsetof(struct foo, a.x[n])
a documented extension? I _know_ that it's not promised by 7.17,
but gcc eats it (and obviously that sucker requires extra treatment
in that case).
Parsing __builtin_offsetof() arguments is going to be fun ;-/ Right
now sparse has it as a predefined macro, but if we want to do that
kind of analysis, we need to really parse it. OTOH, that's not
such a big deal... Parser would need to accept
ident ( \[ expr \] | . ident )*
there, typecheck would walk down, check types and find offsets of
struct members on the way down and build expression on the way
back (e.g. in form of constant + sum of stuff from [...]), doing
evaluate_expression() on each index and slapping Int_const_expr
on created nodes accordingly. In the end, slap the Int_const_expr
on resulting expression in obvious way. expand would work as usual,
no interesting nodes surviving by that point...
OK, that's doable and probably should be split into implementation
of __builtin_offsetof() (sans Int_const_expr logics) and Int_const_expr
parts merged into the patch that does all handling of integer constant
expressions.
Joy. OK, folks, disregard 16/16 in the current form; everything prior
to it stands on its own.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-24 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-24 8:05 [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions Al Viro
2007-06-24 17:47 ` Al Viro
2007-06-24 18:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-24 18:35 ` Al Viro
2007-06-24 19:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-24 19:40 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-24 20:38 ` Al Viro [this message]
2007-06-24 21:42 ` Neil Booth
2007-06-24 23:07 ` Al Viro
2007-06-25 6:16 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-25 5:31 ` Josh Triplett
2007-06-25 19:55 ` Al Viro
2007-06-26 3:12 ` Josh Triplett
2007-06-26 22:10 ` Al Viro
2007-06-26 22:11 ` Al Viro
2007-06-26 23:32 ` Neil Booth
2007-06-27 0:18 ` Al Viro
2007-06-27 0:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-27 0:37 ` Al Viro
2007-06-27 0:29 ` Derek M Jones
2007-06-27 0:41 ` Al Viro
2007-06-27 11:52 ` Neil Booth
2007-06-27 12:19 ` Al Viro
2007-06-27 12:26 ` Neil Booth
2007-06-27 12:37 ` Al Viro
2007-06-27 12:10 ` Neil Booth
2007-06-27 12:30 ` Al Viro
2007-06-27 12:59 ` Neil Booth
2007-06-27 13:18 ` Al Viro
2007-06-27 13:35 ` Neil Booth
2007-06-27 14:06 ` Al Viro
2007-06-27 15:54 ` Al Viro
2007-06-27 14:50 ` Josh Triplett
2007-06-27 14:59 ` Al Viro
2007-06-27 16:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-27 16:34 ` Josh Triplett
2007-06-27 17:25 ` Al Viro
2007-06-27 17:29 ` Al Viro
2007-06-27 17:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-27 18:04 ` Al Viro
2007-06-27 22:50 ` Neil Booth
2007-06-28 9:08 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-26 22:49 ` Josh Triplett
2007-06-25 6:13 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-24 19:59 ` Al Viro
2007-06-24 18:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-06-24 19:10 ` Al Viro
2007-06-24 18:18 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-24 18:44 ` Al Viro
2007-06-24 19:09 ` Segher Boessenkool
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070624203837.GE21478@ftp.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).