[PATCH 1/6] Bitfield without explicit sign should be a warning, not an error

[Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>]

The -Wdefault-bitfield-sign is supposed to control a warning, just like
other -W options.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
---

 parse.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/parse.c b/parse.c
index cb9f87a..ab3a096 100644
--- a/parse.c
+++ b/parse.c
@@ -1282,7 +1282,7 @@ static struct token *handle_bitfield(struct token *token, struct symbol *decl)
 		    !(bitfield_type->ctype.modifiers & MOD_EXPLICITLY_SIGNED) &&
 		    is_signed) {
 			// The sign of bitfields is unspecified by default.
-			sparse_error(token->pos, "dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned'");
+			warning(token->pos, "dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned'");
 		}
 	}
 	bitfield->bit_size = width;