From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle: proscribe do-while without braces. Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:53:49 -0700 Message-ID: <20070727005349.512c2f8d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <1185485822.4459.1.camel@josh-work.beaverton.ibm.com> <46A93F92.6050708@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <20070726175929.730fc0be.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <46A9A18D.2050401@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:57689 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761192AbXG0HyT (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jul 2007 03:54:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: <46A9A18D.2050401@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Sender: linux-sparse-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org To: Stefan Richter Cc: Krzysztof Halasa , Josh Triplett , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 09:41:01 +0200 Stefan Richter wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 02:42:58 +0200 Stefan Richter wrote: > >> Besides, how about reorienting the CodingStyle text to the essential? > ... > > If sparse has gone and added a warning for this then it is more than > > nitpicking. Reducing the amount of noise coming out of sparse is useful. > > Sure, that'd be useful. But then, SubmitChecklist already tells us to > check with sparse before submission. rofl. First we have to talk everyone into checking their stuff with gcc.