From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org
Subject: sparse context warning problem ...
Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 17:24:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200805101724.04014.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
I just noticed this with some obviously correct code... and verified
that it's a regression in current GIT version of "sparse" since it
now rejects code which previously passed just fine.
The issue is a not-uncommon idiom, where a function must be called
with a lock held, and briefly drops it. The way this has previously
been addressed, originally suggested by Linus and used in various
places in the kernel (but, I observe, not in the "sparse" internal
validation test cases) is:
static void
finish_urb(struct ohci_hcd *ohci, struct urb *urb, int status)
__releases(ohci->lock)
__acquires(ohci->lock)
{
...
}
But current versions of "sparse" complain (wrongly):
drivers/usb/host/ohci-q.c:66:2: warning: context imbalance in 'finish_urb': __context__ statement expected different context
drivers/usb/host/ohci-q.c:66:2: context '<noident>': wanted >= 0, got -1
Presumably this is this a known bug ... is a fix on the way?
(Meanwhile, I can just ignore this bogus output.)
- Dave
next reply other threads:[~2008-05-11 0:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-11 0:24 David Brownell [this message]
2008-05-11 0:40 ` sparse context warning problem Johannes Berg
2008-05-11 3:18 ` David Brownell
2008-05-11 9:46 ` Johannes Berg
2008-05-13 21:52 ` Johannes Berg
2008-05-14 13:58 ` David Brownell
2008-05-14 14:06 ` Johannes Berg
2008-05-29 8:47 ` Johannes Berg
2008-05-29 9:39 ` David Brownell
2008-05-29 9:54 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200805101724.04014.david-b@pacbell.net \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).