linux-sparse.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org
Subject: sparse context warning problem ...
Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 17:24:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200805101724.04014.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)

I just noticed this with some obviously correct code... and verified
that it's a regression in current GIT version of "sparse" since it
now rejects code which previously passed just fine.

The issue is a not-uncommon idiom, where a function must be called
with a lock held, and briefly drops it.  The way this has previously
been addressed, originally suggested by Linus and used in various
places in the kernel (but, I observe, not in the "sparse" internal
validation test cases) is:

  static void
  finish_urb(struct ohci_hcd *ohci, struct urb *urb, int status)
  __releases(ohci->lock)
  __acquires(ohci->lock)
  {
	...
  }

But current versions of "sparse" complain (wrongly):

  drivers/usb/host/ohci-q.c:66:2: warning: context imbalance in 'finish_urb': __context__ statement expected different context
  drivers/usb/host/ohci-q.c:66:2:    context '<noident>': wanted >= 0, got -1

Presumably this is this a known bug ... is a fix on the way?
(Meanwhile, I can just ignore this bogus output.)

- Dave


             reply	other threads:[~2008-05-11  0:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-11  0:24 David Brownell [this message]
2008-05-11  0:40 ` sparse context warning problem Johannes Berg
2008-05-11  3:18   ` David Brownell
2008-05-11  9:46     ` Johannes Berg
2008-05-13 21:52   ` Johannes Berg
2008-05-14 13:58     ` David Brownell
2008-05-14 14:06       ` Johannes Berg
2008-05-29  8:47       ` Johannes Berg
2008-05-29  9:39         ` David Brownell
2008-05-29  9:54           ` Johannes Berg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200805101724.04014.david-b@pacbell.net \
    --to=david-b@pacbell.net \
    --cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).