From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Derek M Jones <derek@knosof.co.uk>
Cc: Christopher Li <sparse@chrisli.org>, linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fun with declarations and definitions
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 05:36:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090206053655.GS28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090205211921.GP28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 09:19:21PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> IOW, direct_declarator() (which doubles for direct-abstract-declarator) should
> have more than one-bit indication of which case we've got. Right now it's
> done by "have we passed a non-NULL ident ** to store the identifier being
> declared"; that's not enough. What we need is explicit 'is that a part of
> parameter declaration' flag; then the rule turns into
> if (p && *p)
> fn = 1; /* we'd seen identifier already, can't be nested */
> else if match_op(next, ')')
> fn = 1; /* empty list can't be direct-declarator or
> * direct-abstract-declarator */
> else
> fn = (in_parameter && lookup_type(next));
Umm... It's a bit more subtle (p goes NULL after the nested one is
handled), so we need to keep track of "don't allow nested declarator from
that point on" explicitly. Patch follows:
Subject: [PATCH] Handle nested declarators vs. parameter lists correctly
Seeing a typedef name after ( means that we have a parameter-type-list
only if we are parsing a parameter declaration or a typename; otherwise
it might very well be a redeclaration (e.g. int (T); when T had been a
typedef in outer scope).
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
parse.c | 26 +++++++++++++++-----------
validation/nested-declarator.c | 11 +++++++++++
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 validation/nested-declarator.c
diff --git a/parse.c b/parse.c
index 7e3191a..73e7b65 100644
--- a/parse.c
+++ b/parse.c
@@ -1227,7 +1227,7 @@ static struct token *abstract_array_declarator(struct token *token, struct symbo
}
static struct token *parameter_type_list(struct token *, struct symbol *, struct ident **p);
-static struct token *declarator(struct token *token, struct symbol *sym, struct ident **p);
+static struct token *declarator(struct token *token, struct symbol *sym, struct ident **p, int);
static struct token *handle_attributes(struct token *token, struct ctype *ctype, unsigned int keywords)
{
@@ -1247,13 +1247,15 @@ static struct token *handle_attributes(struct token *token, struct ctype *ctype,
return token;
}
-static struct token *direct_declarator(struct token *token, struct symbol *decl, struct ident **p)
+static struct token *direct_declarator(struct token *token, struct symbol *decl, struct ident **p, int prefer_abstract)
{
struct ctype *ctype = &decl->ctype;
+ int dont_nest = 0;
if (p && token_type(token) == TOKEN_IDENT) {
*p = token->ident;
token = token->next;
+ dont_nest = 1;
}
for (;;) {
@@ -1275,14 +1277,16 @@ static struct token *direct_declarator(struct token *token, struct symbol *decl,
int fn;
next = handle_attributes(next, ctype, KW_ATTRIBUTE);
- fn = (p && *p) || match_op(next, ')') || lookup_type(next);
+ fn = dont_nest || match_op(next, ')') ||
+ (prefer_abstract && lookup_type(next));
if (!fn) {
struct symbol *base_type = ctype->base_type;
- token = declarator(next, decl, p);
+ token = declarator(next, decl, p, prefer_abstract);
token = expect(token, ')', "in nested declarator");
while (ctype->base_type != base_type)
ctype = &ctype->base_type->ctype;
+ dont_nest = 1;
p = NULL;
continue;
}
@@ -1336,10 +1340,10 @@ static struct token *pointer(struct token *token, struct ctype *ctype)
return token;
}
-static struct token *declarator(struct token *token, struct symbol *sym, struct ident **p)
+static struct token *declarator(struct token *token, struct symbol *sym, struct ident **p, int prefer_abstract)
{
token = pointer(token, &sym->ctype);
- return direct_declarator(token, sym, p);
+ return direct_declarator(token, sym, p, prefer_abstract);
}
static struct token *handle_bitfield(struct token *token, struct symbol *decl)
@@ -1399,7 +1403,7 @@ static struct token *declaration_list(struct token *token, struct symbol_list **
struct ident *ident = NULL;
struct symbol *decl = alloc_symbol(token->pos, SYM_NODE);
decl->ctype = ctype;
- token = declarator(token, decl, &ident);
+ token = declarator(token, decl, &ident, 0);
decl->ident = ident;
if (match_op(token, ':')) {
token = handle_bitfield(token, decl);
@@ -1439,7 +1443,7 @@ static struct token *parameter_declaration(struct token *token, struct symbol **
sym = alloc_symbol(token->pos, SYM_NODE);
sym->ctype = ctype;
*tree = sym;
- token = declarator(token, sym, &ident);
+ token = declarator(token, sym, &ident, 1);
sym->ident = ident;
apply_modifiers(token->pos, &sym->ctype);
sym->endpos = token->pos;
@@ -1451,7 +1455,7 @@ struct token *typename(struct token *token, struct symbol **p, int mod)
struct symbol *sym = alloc_symbol(token->pos, SYM_NODE);
*p = sym;
token = declaration_specifiers(token, &sym->ctype, 0);
- token = declarator(token, sym, NULL);
+ token = declarator(token, sym, NULL, 1);
apply_modifiers(token->pos, &sym->ctype);
if (sym->ctype.modifiers & MOD_STORAGE & ~mod)
warning(sym->pos, "storage class in typename (%s)",
@@ -2261,7 +2265,7 @@ struct token *external_declaration(struct token *token, struct symbol_list **lis
token = declaration_specifiers(token, &ctype, 0);
decl = alloc_symbol(token->pos, SYM_NODE);
decl->ctype = ctype;
- token = declarator(token, decl, &ident);
+ token = declarator(token, decl, &ident, 0);
apply_modifiers(token->pos, &decl->ctype);
decl->endpos = token->pos;
@@ -2333,7 +2337,7 @@ struct token *external_declaration(struct token *token, struct symbol_list **lis
decl = alloc_symbol(token->pos, SYM_NODE);
decl->ctype = ctype;
token = declaration_specifiers(token, &decl->ctype, 1);
- token = declarator(token, decl, &ident);
+ token = declarator(token, decl, &ident, 0);
apply_modifiers(token->pos, &decl->ctype);
decl->endpos = token->pos;
if (!ident) {
diff --git a/validation/nested-declarator.c b/validation/nested-declarator.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..24ed833
--- /dev/null
+++ b/validation/nested-declarator.c
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+typedef int T;
+extern void f(int);
+static void g(int x)
+{
+ int (T);
+ T = x;
+ f(T);
+}
+/*
+ * check-name: nested declarator vs. parameters
+ */
--
1.5.6.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-06 5:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-02 7:30 fun with declarations and definitions Al Viro
2009-02-02 20:17 ` Christopher Li
2009-02-02 20:58 ` Al Viro
2009-02-02 22:25 ` Christopher Li
2009-02-03 3:07 ` Christopher Li
2009-02-03 4:13 ` Al Viro
2009-02-05 18:40 ` Christopher Li
2009-02-05 18:47 ` Derek M Jones
2009-02-05 20:28 ` Al Viro
2009-02-05 21:19 ` Al Viro
2009-02-06 5:36 ` Al Viro [this message]
2009-02-09 7:52 ` Christopher Li
2009-02-09 8:54 ` Al Viro
2009-02-05 22:41 ` Christopher Li
2009-02-05 23:22 ` Al Viro
2009-02-03 4:41 ` Al Viro
2009-02-03 6:28 ` Ralf Wildenhues
2009-02-05 18:52 ` Christopher Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090206053655.GS28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=derek@knosof.co.uk \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sparse@chrisli.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).