From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: [bug, bisected, -chrisl] Segfault at evaluate.c:341 Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:52:50 +0000 Message-ID: <20090319215250.GF28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <154e089b0903190649k7f099c93qedf6eb8e6a1c0a86@mail.gmail.com> <20090319144622.GA28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <154e089b0903191138x15b66808v70bc862d7a13e3c2@mail.gmail.com> <20090319191431.GD28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <70318cbf0903191304k1fefe9afkb4be21550d8f9abe@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:40159 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752290AbZCSVwy (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:52:54 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <70318cbf0903191304k1fefe9afkb4be21550d8f9abe@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-sparse-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org To: Christopher Li Cc: Hannes Eder , linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, Nicholas Mc Guire On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 01:04:20PM -0700, Christopher Li wrote: > We should stop the segfault though. I take a look at it. It seems that > there is a SYM_NODE with base_type is NULL. I guess in some of > the error path we result in an invalid AST three. We are getting some mess with K&R declarations. Which is bloody likely to be my fault; will check.