From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: Nasal demons in preprocessor use (Re: [PATCH] test-suite: new preprocessor test case) Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:08:53 +0100 Message-ID: <20090320180853.GA24154@elte.hu> References: <20090319175544.13691.42362.stgit@f10box.hanneseder.net> <20090319182628.GB28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <154e089b0903191151q37ab7b20o43838845af12966f@mail.gmail.com> <20090319190730.GC28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20090319192758.GB24318@elte.hu> <19f34abd0903191320qdd73530ud85081d23e17b266@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:60990 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752732AbZCTSJP (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:09:15 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <19f34abd0903191320qdd73530ud85081d23e17b266@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-sparse-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org To: Vegard Nossum , Alexander Viro Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Al Viro , Christopher Li , linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, Hannes Eder , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Vegard Nossum wrote: > I guess this means that kmemcheck branch should be withdrawn from > linux-next, at least temporarily, as I have no immediate > workarounds/alternatives. Stephen, can you drop it? Al Viro, well done :-( Ingo