From: Kamil Dudka <kdudka@redhat.com>
To: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>, linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add warnings enum-to-int and int-to-enum
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 18:23:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200909021823.36662.kdudka@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090902152146.GA7881@feather>
On Wednesday 02 of September 2009 17:21:46 Josh Triplett wrote:
> Typo. I meant ENUM_TYPE_A:
>
> var_a = (enum ENUM_TYPE_A) 0;
>
> Hopefully that makes more sense as an "always OK" test. :)
>
> Another crazy test for the "always OK" section:
>
> anon_enum_var = (__typeof__(anon_enum_var)) 0;
> anon_enum_var = (__typeof__(anon_enum_var)) VALUE_A;
All three cases pass for me, even with -Wenum-to-int. No problem here.
> > - warn_for_different_enum_types (old->pos, old->ctype, type);
> > + warn_for_different_enum_types (old->pos, old->ctype, type,
> > + old->enum_type);
>
> At this point, it might make more sense to just pass old, rather than
> three of its fields. Would that work for the other callers of this
> function? In any case, that change can wait until after this patch.
At first glance the only change would be in usual_conversions() in reporting
slightly different location in some rear cases -- no big deal I think.
But in fact I haven't investigated yet how to trigger all the particular
possibilities of warn_for_different_enum_types() invocation to test this
properly. I'll give it a try later today.
> > + warn_for_enum_to_int_cast (old, type);
> > + warn_for_int_to_enum_cast (old, type);
>
> I just realized that both of these functions need renaming as well:
> s/cast/conversion/ or similar. As with the manpage changes before,
> "cast" describes the case it *doesn't* warn about.
My line of thinking was "implied vs. explicit cast" ... but I am fine with
the rename. It'll be more obvious.
> > --- a/sparse.1
> > +++ b/sparse.1
> > @@ -149,6 +149,19 @@ Sparse issues these warnings by default. To turn
> > them off, use \fB\-Wno\-enum\-mismatch\fR.
> > .
> > .TP
> > +.B \-Wenum\-to\-int
> > +Warn about converting an \fBenum\fR type to int. An explicit cast to int
> > will +suppress this warning.
> > +.
> > +.TP
> > +.B \-Wint\-to\-enum
> > +Warn about converting int to \fBenum\fR type. An explicit cast to the
> > right +\fBenum\fR type will suppress this warning.
> > +
> > +Sparse issues these warnings by default. To turn them off, use
> > +\fB\-Wno\-int\-to\-enum\fR.
>
> This manpage text looks good to me.
Thanks for review!
> You could include this test case in the patch, as an addition to the
> test suite.
No problem I think. We have generally two choices:
1) The whole current test-enum.c as a test-case running with all three
warnings enabled.
2) Split the test to three parts, each for one separate -W option, and
then run it as three separate test-cases.
I think the second choice has better coverage. What's your opinion?
Kamil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-02 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-30 22:32 sparse segv with simple test Stephen Hemminger
2009-08-30 22:53 ` Kamil Dudka
2009-08-31 15:57 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-08-31 18:12 ` Kamil Dudka
2009-08-31 18:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-08-31 19:04 ` Kamil Dudka
2009-08-31 20:53 ` Josh Triplett
2009-09-01 21:59 ` [PATCH] add warnings enum-to-int and int-to-enum Kamil Dudka
2009-09-01 23:24 ` Josh Triplett
2009-09-02 0:27 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-09-02 17:56 ` Daniel Barkalow
2009-09-02 18:04 ` Kamil Dudka
2009-09-02 18:43 ` Daniel Barkalow
2009-09-02 18:56 ` Josh Triplett
2009-09-02 19:19 ` Daniel Barkalow
2009-09-02 19:58 ` Kamil Dudka
2009-09-02 11:53 ` Kamil Dudka
2009-09-02 15:21 ` Josh Triplett
2009-09-02 16:23 ` Kamil Dudka [this message]
2009-09-02 16:38 ` Christopher Li
2009-09-02 19:03 ` Josh Triplett
2009-09-02 19:19 ` Kamil Dudka
2009-09-02 22:35 ` Kamil Dudka
2009-09-03 9:42 ` Christopher Li
2009-09-03 11:47 ` Kamil Dudka
2009-09-03 18:38 ` Christopher Li
2009-09-03 18:54 ` Kamil Dudka
2009-09-03 20:02 ` Christopher Li
2009-09-13 19:28 ` Kamil Dudka
2009-09-13 19:55 ` Christopher Li
2009-09-13 20:09 ` Kamil Dudka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200909021823.36662.kdudka@redhat.com \
--to=kdudka@redhat.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).