From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kamil Dudka Subject: enum warning patch (was Re: Defect in linearization of short circuit &&) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:11:31 +0100 Message-ID: <201002162111.31449.kdudka@redhat.com> References: <4B77FD0F.50401@googlemail.com> <4B7AEFDF.3000608@googlemail.com> <70318cbf1002161136o56cd0494pc6a2e38e28f1729c@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57207 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932757Ab0BPUMk (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:12:40 -0500 In-Reply-To: <70318cbf1002161136o56cd0494pc6a2e38e28f1729c@mail.gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-sparse-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org To: Christopher Li Cc: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 16 of February 2010 20:36:21 Christopher Li wrote: > I am still sitting on the enum warning patch. That is the only thing > holding up another minor release. Still trying to save a sizeof(void *) within struct expression? It makes no sense to me - on my box I am getting the same sizeof(struct expression)==64 before/after the patch applied. Kamil