From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kamil Dudka Subject: Re: enum warning patch (was Re: Defect in linearization of short circuit &&) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:18:28 +0100 Message-ID: <201002162118.28516.kdudka@redhat.com> References: <4B77FD0F.50401@googlemail.com> <70318cbf1002161136o56cd0494pc6a2e38e28f1729c@mail.gmail.com> <201002162111.31449.kdudka@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:24908 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756823Ab0BPUTh (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:19:37 -0500 In-Reply-To: <201002162111.31449.kdudka@redhat.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-sparse-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org To: Christopher Li Cc: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 16 of February 2010 21:11:31 Kamil Dudka wrote: > It makes no sense to me - on my box I am getting the same > sizeof(struct expression)==64 before/after the patch applied. I've just remembered. There was problem on a 32bit system - 32 bytes before and 36 bytes after the patch applied... Kamil