From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] OSS: soundcard: locking bug in sound_ioctl()
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 23:43:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101012064326.GB1702@feather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201010120839.15257.arnd@arndb.de>
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 08:39:14AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 October 2010 00:23:08 Josh Triplett wrote:
> > Assuming that the underlying function only returns zero/non-zero and
> > that the actual return value doesn't matter, then you can use the
> > __cond_lock macro from compiler.h for this:
> >
> > # define __cond_lock(x,c) ((c) ? ({ __acquire(x); 1; }) : 0)
> >
>
> The return from mutex_lock_{killable,interruptible} is an error
> value, not true/false, so it actually matters. We know that the only
> possible error that is currently returned is -EINTR though, so we
> could do a similar trick and define another
>
> #define __cond_mutex(x, c) ((!c) ? ({ __acquire(x); 0; }) : -EINTR)
>
> My fear was that this would impact code generation.
If __cond_lock doesn't fit, then you could just define a generic wrapper
to capture the pattern of preserving a function's return value, and use
that for all the mutex calls. And if you just preserve the return
value, and __acquire compiles to nothing for GCC, then GCC should just
optimize away the extra copy into a local variable.
- Josh Triplett
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-12 6:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20101010173352.GB5851@bicker>
[not found] ` <201010102039.34858.arnd@arndb.de>
2010-10-11 8:13 ` [patch 1/2] OSS: soundcard: locking bug in sound_ioctl() Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-11 8:50 ` Johannes Berg
2010-10-11 10:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-11 10:52 ` Johannes Berg
2010-10-11 18:54 ` Josh Triplett
2010-10-11 20:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-11 22:23 ` Josh Triplett
2010-10-12 6:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-12 6:43 ` Josh Triplett [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101012064326.GB1702@feather \
--to=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=error27@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).