linux-sparse.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] OSS: soundcard: locking bug in sound_ioctl()
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 23:43:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101012064326.GB1702@feather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201010120839.15257.arnd@arndb.de>

On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 08:39:14AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 October 2010 00:23:08 Josh Triplett wrote:
> > Assuming that the underlying function only returns zero/non-zero and
> > that the actual return value doesn't matter, then you can use the
> > __cond_lock macro from compiler.h for this:
> > 
> > # define __cond_lock(x,c)       ((c) ? ({ __acquire(x); 1; }) : 0)
> > 
> 
> The return from mutex_lock_{killable,interruptible} is an error
> value, not true/false, so it actually matters. We know that the only
> possible error that is currently returned is -EINTR though, so we
> could do a similar trick and define another
> 
> #define __cond_mutex(x, c)	((!c) ? ({ __acquire(x); 0; }) : -EINTR)
> 
> My fear was that this would impact code generation.

If __cond_lock doesn't fit, then you could just define a generic wrapper
to capture the pattern of preserving a function's return value, and use
that for all the mutex calls.  And if you just preserve the return
value, and __acquire compiles to nothing for GCC, then GCC should just
optimize away the extra copy into a local variable.

- Josh Triplett

      reply	other threads:[~2010-10-12  6:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20101010173352.GB5851@bicker>
     [not found] ` <201010102039.34858.arnd@arndb.de>
2010-10-11  8:13   ` [patch 1/2] OSS: soundcard: locking bug in sound_ioctl() Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-11  8:50     ` Johannes Berg
2010-10-11 10:50       ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-11 10:52         ` Johannes Berg
2010-10-11 18:54           ` Josh Triplett
2010-10-11 20:42             ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-11 22:23               ` Josh Triplett
2010-10-12  6:39                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-12  6:43                   ` Josh Triplett [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101012064326.GB1702@feather \
    --to=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=error27@gmail.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=perex@perex.cz \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).