From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: including sparse headers in C++ code
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 23:12:46 +0100
Message-ID: <20101019221246.GW19804@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
References: <AANLkTimdy9TwwSJM=rwTjXdRsnove6A2b0=d4M_dOin0@mail.gmail.com>
 <AANLkTimhh3zj8kgvaSQq9_CS711mLw8skrWL4yUgvJzT@mail.gmail.com>
 <AANLkTimZb1PsnKcMQ_Ka6dkk7fNwXiJb6_U4GcckLsF4@mail.gmail.com>
 <20101016191153.GA19324@feather>
 <AANLkTi=tpKLvWh6VKsizpZaxYMBntaGU1gC5uRu1_bND@mail.gmail.com>
 <20101018053955.GA1628@feather>
 <AANLkTim2ti8+aht_f=Mv=0iLZCvF65CFF6GNP2gHF=Kq@mail.gmail.com>
 <AANLkTinuRiaMZExudng5ECeunmF4s2ptnfaE=fYBft=i@mail.gmail.com>
 <20101019213109.GV19804@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
 <1287524804.3483.26.camel@radiator.bos.redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-sparse-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:59946 "EHLO
	ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754600Ab0JSWNE (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:13:04 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1287524804.3483.26.camel@radiator.bos.redhat.com>
Sender: linux-sparse-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org
To: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
Cc: Tomas Klacko <tomas.klacko@gmail.com>, Christopher Li <sparse@chrisli.org>, Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>, linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 05:46:44PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 22:31 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:03:42PM +0200, Tomas Klacko wrote:
> > > @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ static struct symbol_op char_op = {
> > >  	.type = KW_SPECIFIER,
> > >  	.test = Set_T|Set_Long|Set_Short,
> > >  	.set = Set_T|Set_Char,
> > > -	.class = CChar,
> > > +	.klass = CChar,
> > >  };
> > 
> > Egads...  Why not "kC1455", while you are at it?  Seriously, if you feel the
> > need to rename that, at least use something more palatable.  Hell, even
> > adjust_type would be better...
> FWIW, "klass" is used as a spelling of "class" in .c code by Ruby, by
> the GTK/GNOME stack, Mono, OpenJDK, Dalvik, and others.

I'd say that it's an argument _against_ doing that, if anything...