From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
To: Ed Cashin <ecashin@coraid.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, rob@landley.net,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, sam@ravnborg.org,
sparse@chrisli.org, ak@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/sparse.txt: document context annotations for lock checking
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:09:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121018230948.GC10627@jtriplet-mobl1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1350570446.22036@cat.he.net>
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 07:27:26AM -0700, Ed Cashin wrote:
> The context feature of sparse is used with the Linux kernel
> sources to check for imbalanced uses of locks. Document the
> annotations defined in include/linux/compiler.h that tell sparse
> what to expect when a lock is held on function entry, exit, or
> both.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ed Cashin <ecashin@coraid.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
> Documentation/sparse.txt | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/sparse.txt b/Documentation/sparse.txt
> index 4909d41..eceab13 100644
> --- a/Documentation/sparse.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/sparse.txt
> @@ -49,6 +49,24 @@ be generated without __CHECK_ENDIAN__.
> __bitwise - noisy stuff; in particular, __le*/__be* are that. We really
> don't want to drown in noise unless we'd explicitly asked for it.
>
> +Using sparse for lock checking
> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> +
> +The following macros are undefined for gcc and defined during a sparse
> +run to use the "context" tracking feature of sparse, applied to
> +locking. These annotations tell sparse when a lock is held, with
> +regard to the annotated function's entry and exit.
> +
> +__must_hold - The specified lock is held on function entry and exit.
> +
> +__acquires - The specified lock is held on function exit, but not entry.
> +
> +__releases - The specified lock is held on function entry, but not exit.
> +
> +If the function enters and exits without the lock held, acquiring and
> +releasing the lock inside the function in a balanced way, no
> +annotation is needed. The tree annotations above are for cases where
> +sparse would otherwise report a context imbalance.
>
> Getting sparse
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> --
> 1.7.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-18 23:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-18 14:27 [PATCH] Documentation/sparse.txt: document context annotations for lock checking Ed Cashin
2012-10-18 23:09 ` Josh Triplett [this message]
2012-10-19 22:14 ` Christopher Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121018230948.GC10627@jtriplet-mobl1 \
--to=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ecashin@coraid.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=sparse@chrisli.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox