From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/10] compiler-gcc{3,4}.h: Use GCC_VERSION macro Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 00:34:13 +0200 Message-ID: <20121024223413.GA8828@liondog.tnic> References: <1351096132-12244-1-git-send-email-daniel.santos@pobox.com> <1351096441-12388-3-git-send-email-daniel.santos@pobox.com> <20121024190546.GA17945@liondog.tnic> <20121024214900.GA5925@jtriplet-mobl1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:54734 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422652Ab2JXWeQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:34:16 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121024214900.GA5925@jtriplet-mobl1> Sender: linux-sparse-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org To: Josh Triplett Cc: danielfsantos@att.net, LKML , Andi Kleen , Andrea Arcangeli , Andrew Morton , Christopher Li , Daniel Santos , David Daney , David Howells , Joe Perches , Konstantin Khlebnikov , linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, Michel Lespinasse , Paul Gortmaker , Pavel Pisa , Peter Zijlstra , Steven Rostedt , David Rientjes On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 02:49:00PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > I can't seem to recall so did we explain already why ">= 40100" instead > > of "> 40000"? > > > > I mean, it is the same, but still... > > __GNUC_MINOR__ > 0 means __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 1, so that would allow 4.1 or > newer. However, GCC_VERSION > 40000 would also allow 4.0.n for n > 0. Ah, sure. In that case Acked-by: Borislav Petkov Thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris.