From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Josh Triplett Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 9/9] bug.h: Convert BUILD_BUG{,_ON} to use BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 18:02:32 -0700 Message-ID: <20121031010232.GA18229@leaf> References: <1351457648-7453-1-git-send-email-daniel.santos@pobox.com> <1351457835-7553-9-git-send-email-daniel.santos@pobox.com> <20121030191905.GG28499@liondog.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:57712 "EHLO relay4-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755419Ab2JaBCm (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2012 21:02:42 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121030191905.GG28499@liondog.tnic> Sender: linux-sparse-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org To: Borislav Petkov , Daniel Santos , LKML , Andi Kleen , Andrea Arcangeli , Andrew Morton , Christopher Li , David Daney , David Howells , Joe Perches , Konstantin Khlebnikov , linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, Michel Lespinasse , Paul Gortmaker , Pavel Pisa , Peter Zijlstra , Steven Rostedt , David Rientjes On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 08:19:05PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 03:57:15PM -0500, danielfsantos@att.net wrote: > > Remove duplicate code by converting BUILD_BUG and BUILD_BUG_ON to just > > call BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG. This not only reduces source code bloat, but > > also prevents the possibility of code being changed for one macro and > > not for the other (which was previously the case for BUILD_BUG and > > BUILD_BUG_ON). > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Santos > > --- > > include/linux/bug.h | 17 +++-------------- > > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/bug.h b/include/linux/bug.h > > index 3bc1ddf..b58ba51 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/bug.h > > +++ b/include/linux/bug.h > > @@ -81,14 +81,8 @@ struct pt_regs; > > #ifndef __OPTIMIZE__ > > #define BUILD_BUG_ON(condition) __compiletime_error_fallback(condition) > > #else > > -#define BUILD_BUG_ON(condition) \ > > - do { \ > > - extern void __build_bug_on_failed(void) \ > > - __compiletime_error("BUILD_BUG_ON failed"); \ > > - __compiletime_error_fallback(condition); \ > > - if (condition) \ > > - __build_bug_on_failed(); \ > > - } while(0) > > +#define BUILD_BUG_ON(condition) \ > > + BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: " #condition) > > Concatenating "condition" might not be very informative in all cases. > For example: > > BUILD_BUG_ON(1); > > Having __LINE__ is good enough IMHO. While it doesn't always help, it may help sometimes. Worst case, BUILD_BUG_ON(1) gives you no less information than it did before; best case, it gives you useful data. - Josh Triplett