From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Josh Triplett Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib.c: skip --param parameters Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 09:02:38 -0700 Message-ID: <20140616160238.GA2746@jtriplet-mobl1> References: <1402915386-28210-1-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1402915386-28210-1-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 01:43:06PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Very dumb patch to just skip --param allow-store-data-races=0 introduced in > newest Linux kernel buildsystem. > > Actually the option is present in few GCC versions and probably should be > handled properly. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko As far as I can tell, this seems to only handle "--param arg"; however, according to the thread on LKML, GCC handles --param=arg as well. Could you please handle that variant too? > lib.c | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/lib.c b/lib.c > index bf3e91c..e56037b 100644 > --- a/lib.c > +++ b/lib.c > @@ -673,6 +673,12 @@ static char **handle_version(char *arg, char **next) > exit(0); > } > > +static char **handle_param(char *arg, char **next) > +{ > + ++next; > + return ++next; > +} > + > struct switches { > const char *name; > char **(*fn)(char *, char **); > @@ -681,6 +687,7 @@ struct switches { > static char **handle_long_options(char *arg, char **next) > { > static struct switches cmd[] = { > + { "param", handle_param }, > { "version", handle_version }, > { NULL, NULL } > }; > -- > 2.0.0 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html