From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Azat Khuzhin Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sparse, llvm: compile: skip function prototypes to avoid SIGSEGV Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 08:18:06 +0300 Message-ID: <20150612051806.GD29381@azat> References: <1431815545-21250-1-git-send-email-a3at.mail@gmail.com> <1431815545-21250-2-git-send-email-a3at.mail@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-lb0-f174.google.com ([209.85.217.174]:34802 "EHLO mail-lb0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750956AbbFLFSL (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jun 2015 01:18:11 -0400 Received: by lbcmx3 with SMTP id mx3so13705749lbc.1 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 22:18:09 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-sparse-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org To: Christopher Li Cc: Sparse ML On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 05:50:16PM -0700, Christopher Li wrote: > On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Azat Khuzhin wrote: > > > > You can't pass function to LLVMConstNull(), according to > > Constant::getNullValue, and sparse-llvm already handle functions differently > > (i.e. there will be no call to LLVMConstNull(), but this is not true for > > > The patch looks good. I am applying it. However I just notice that you did not > provide the signed-off-by line. > > Can you resend both patch with the signed off line? Sure, I'm doing this right now! Thanks, Azat.