From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luc Van Oostenryck Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 22:28:28 +0200 Message-ID: <20161028202827.GA2185@macbook.local> References: <87lh75jh9l.fsf@gmail.com> <20160315223616.GB2679@macpro.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f66.google.com ([74.125.82.66]:32842 "EHLO mail-wm0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753955AbcJ1U2g (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:28:36 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f66.google.com with SMTP id m83so8901498wmc.0 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:28:35 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160315223616.GB2679@macpro.local> Sender: linux-sparse-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org To: Nicolai Stange Cc: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, Christopher Li , Josh Triplett On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:36:17PM +0100, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote: > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 03:28:38AM +0100, Nicolai Stange wrote: > > Here comes the greatly enhanced v3 of this series. > > > > > I had a few remarks and some questions in some of the patches > but I think it's turning pretty good. > > I'm wondering if you have already tried to use it on something of > interesting size like the kernel? If yes, did it gave something useful? > > > Chris, I have reviewed this rather deeply. I think the approach is sound > and sane et the code seems quite correct. Do you think you will have > some time soon to look at it? > Chris, is it possible to have some feedback on this, please? Is there anything more I can do to help? Best regards, Luc