From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luc Van Oostenryck Subject: Re: [PATCH] sparse: update __builtin_object_size() prototype Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:28:50 +0100 Message-ID: <20161116232850.GB21402@macpro.local> References: <1474467238-20939-1-git-send-email-lrichard@redhat.com> <20161107100934.GB443@macbook.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f65.google.com ([74.125.82.65]:36334 "EHLO mail-wm0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932347AbcKPX2y (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2016 18:28:54 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-f65.google.com with SMTP id m203so16050254wma.3 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 15:28:53 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-sparse-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org To: Christopher Li Cc: Linux-Sparse , Lance Richardson , Johannes Berg On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 06:52:51AM +0800, Christopher Li wrote: > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Luc Van Oostenryck > wrote: > > > > Acked-by: Luc Van Oostenryck > > > > > > Chris, can you please take this patch (or Johannes' one). > > When compiling the kernel, there is more than 2000 false warnings > > only for the uaccess.h case described here above. > > Applied and pushed to "chrisl" repository. > > Thanks > > Chris > -- Thanks. BTW, how must we consider this "chrilsi" repository? A bit like a -next repository or more like a working one? Can we consider it as stable for git fetches & pulls? Luc