linux-sparse.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
To: Christopher Li <sparse@chrisli.org>
Cc: Linux-Sparse <linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] testsuite: report as error tests known to fail but which succeed
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 13:52:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161118125251.GA17412@macpro.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANeU7QnHYuW7-h+wKFcQZe=6xNUZgNdSAtLnqdAm=OBNARvR-Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:13:58AM +0800, Christopher Li wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 5:45 AM, Luc Van Oostenryck
> <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Such situation may simply show that what was tested is now fixed
> > and that it's juste the test annotation which need to be adapted,
> > but can be a sign that something else is broken.
> >
> > Reporting the exact result (failure/success, known-to-fail/expect-to-succeed)
> > make the testsuite more useful and allow to use more efficiently
> > git-bisect or other automated testing tools.
> 
> I like what you are doing as a result.
> 
> But I think the implementation has room to improve.
> I don't like deep and messy "else" statement.
> 
> I attach a patch which I modify base on yours. I hope it is
> easier to read. Care to review it?

Yes, I much prefer like this. Thanks.

But there is something I would like to check but I can't do that now.
I'll come back on it later.

Luc

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-18 12:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-02 21:45 [PATCH 0/5] tests & testsuite small improvements Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-11-02 21:45 ` [PATCH 1/5] testsuite: give a proper name to the 'binary-constant' test Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-11-17 10:19   ` Christopher Li
2016-11-02 21:45 ` [PATCH 2/5] testsuite: make tests known to fail effectively fail Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-11-17 14:16   ` Christopher Li
2016-11-02 21:45 ` [PATCH 3/5] testsuite: report as error tests known to fail but which succeed Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-11-17 16:13   ` Christopher Li
2016-11-18 12:52     ` Luc Van Oostenryck [this message]
2016-11-19  0:44     ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-11-20  1:43       ` Christopher Li
2016-11-02 21:45 ` [PATCH 4/5] testsuite: simplify the ioc-typecheck case Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-11-17 16:17   ` Christopher Li
2016-11-02 21:45 ` [PATCH 5/5] testsuite: add a simple test for -Wenum-mismatch Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-11-17 16:25   ` Christopher Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161118125251.GA17412@macpro.local \
    --to=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sparse@chrisli.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).