From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luc Van Oostenryck Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*() Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 18:12:24 +0100 Message-ID: <20161122171224.GA4146@macpro.local> References: <20161117095503.8754-1-johannes@sipsolutions.net> <1479721551.8662.10.camel@sipsolutions.net> <20161122131543.GA8370@macbook.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f67.google.com ([74.125.82.67]:33134 "EHLO mail-wm0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755614AbcKVRM2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2016 12:12:28 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-f67.google.com with SMTP id u144so5206276wmu.0 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 09:12:28 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-sparse-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org To: Christopher Li Cc: Johannes Berg , Linux-Sparse , Nicolai Stange On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:32:52AM +0800, Christopher Li wrote: > > I think it would be best to do any change related tos handling > > of constant expressions on to of Nicolai Stange's serie: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-sparse&m=145429372932235 > > Yes, it is on my patch list. That series can still apply clean. > I just check it. Great. > My current strategy is apply other patches which have impact > on the sparse warning first. Otherwise my anxiety level is too > high, make me hard to pick up and hack sparse. That integer > series needs a relative big chunk of time to review it. For me > it is more important to keep on making progress rather than > solve all problem in one blow. I understand. > I think I have been catch up with most of the patches. Yes, just from memory, there is still one from Oleg, about dissect. > Should be able to work on that soon. Great. Luc