From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luc Van Oostenryck Subject: Re: [RFC] CSE: relax type checking in hashing/compare Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 10:40:13 +0100 Message-ID: <20170227094013.pevbixjonnebaaxa@macbook.local> References: <20170217000608.6433-1-luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com ([74.125.82.68]:33163 "EHLO mail-wm0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751597AbdB0JkY (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Feb 2017 04:40:24 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-f68.google.com with SMTP id v77so12474883wmv.0 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 01:40:16 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-sparse-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org To: Christopher Li Cc: Linux-Sparse , Linus Torvalds On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 04:11:44PM +0800, Christopher Li wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 8:06 AM, Luc Van Oostenryck > wrote: > > I'm missing something? > > > > If not, then the following simple patch should be correct. > > This patch is missing a S-O-B. Can you add one? I did this purposely because it was a RFC. Also: - I still have some doubts about this patch - It won't solve anything, only allow more CSE (but maybe more than really wanted) - There is no urgency at all. So I think it would be better to not include it in the coming release and instead let it ripe a little bit. But if you really prefer to include it, maybe not in a release but in another branch, it's fine for me also. Signed-off-by: Luc Van Oostenryck