From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luc Van Oostenryck Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] more validation of C99 for-loop initializers Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 02:08:40 +0100 Message-ID: <20170306010840.joz7bas55skuzvl3@macpro.local> References: <20170305192152.67931-1-luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-wr0-f175.google.com ([209.85.128.175]:34126 "EHLO mail-wr0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752398AbdCFBIo (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Mar 2017 20:08:44 -0500 Received: by mail-wr0-f175.google.com with SMTP id l37so106298421wrc.1 for ; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 17:08:43 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-sparse-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org To: Christopher Li Cc: Linux-Sparse On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 08:59:35AM +0800, Christopher Li wrote: > On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:21 AM, Luc Van Oostenryck > wrote: > > This serie adds scope & storage validations of C99-style for-loop > > initializers. > > This series looks great now. Thank you. > > All applied to sparse-next. Yes, I like how it turned out. Thanks to you too. Luc