Linux SPARSE checker discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
To: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Christopher Li <sparse@chrisli.org>,
	Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 02/14] canonicalize binops before simplification
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 00:14:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170324231421.14869-3-luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170324231421.14869-1-luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>

Currently, canonicalization of binops (more specifically
insuring that the operands of binops are in canonical order)
is only done after simplify_binop(). But the goal of
canonicalization is to limit the number of cases/patterns
we need to check/handle during ... simplification.
So canonicalization need to be done before simplification.

Fix this by moving (this part of) canonicalization before
doing simplification.

Note 1: the motivation of this patch is to prepare code for
        the canonicalization of compare instructions

Note 2: this patch allow now some simplification of ...
        the simplification code (simplify_binop()), this
	will be done in a later serie.

Note 3: this patch changes slightly the cost of the CSE/
	simplification, positively or negatively, depending
	on the ration of simplification/canonicalization
	that can be done.

Signed-off-by: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
---
 simplify.c | 20 +++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/simplify.c b/simplify.c
index 5d00937f1..66035bbce 100644
--- a/simplify.c
+++ b/simplify.c
@@ -735,13 +735,13 @@ static int canonical_order(pseudo_t p1, pseudo_t p2)
 	return 1;
 }
 
-static int simplify_commutative_binop(struct instruction *insn)
+static int canonicalize_commutative(struct instruction *insn)
 {
-	if (!canonical_order(insn->src1, insn->src2)) {
-		switch_pseudo(insn, &insn->src1, insn, &insn->src2);
-		return REPEAT_CSE;
-	}
-	return 0;
+	if (canonical_order(insn->src1, insn->src2))
+		return 0;
+
+	switch_pseudo(insn, &insn->src1, insn, &insn->src2);
+	return repeat_phase |= REPEAT_CSE;
 }
 
 static inline int simple_pseudo(pseudo_t pseudo)
@@ -1129,17 +1129,15 @@ int simplify_instruction(struct instruction *insn)
 	case OP_ADD: case OP_MULS:
 	case OP_AND: case OP_OR: case OP_XOR:
 	case OP_AND_BOOL: case OP_OR_BOOL:
+		canonicalize_commutative(insn);
 		if (simplify_binop(insn))
 			return REPEAT_CSE;
-		if (simplify_commutative_binop(insn))
-			return REPEAT_CSE;
 		return simplify_associative_binop(insn);
 
 	case OP_MULU:
 	case OP_SET_EQ: case OP_SET_NE:
-		if (simplify_binop(insn))
-			return REPEAT_CSE;
-		return simplify_commutative_binop(insn);
+		canonicalize_commutative(insn);
+		return simplify_binop(insn);
 
 	case OP_SUB:
 	case OP_DIVU: case OP_DIVS:
-- 
2.12.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-03-24 23:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-24 23:14 [PATCH 00/14] prepare LLVM fixes Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-24 23:14 ` [PATCH v5 01/14] don't output value of anonymous symbol's pointer Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-24 23:14 ` Luc Van Oostenryck [this message]
2017-03-24 23:14 ` [PATCH v5 03/14] canonicalize compare instructions Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-24 23:14 ` [PATCH v5 04/14] rewrite compare_opcode() like swap_compare_opcode() Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-24 23:24   ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-24 23:54     ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-25 23:35       ` Christopher Li
2017-03-26  0:22         ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-27 16:29         ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-24 23:14 ` [PATCH v5 05/14] add is_signed_type() Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-24 23:14 ` [PATCH v5 06/14] fix usage of inlined calls Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-24 23:14 ` [PATCH v5 07/14] inlined calls should not block BB packing Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-24 23:14 ` [PATCH v5 08/14] give function's arguments a type via OP_PUSH Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-24 23:14 ` [PATCH v5 09/14] insure that all OP_PUSHs are just before their OP_CALL Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-24 23:14 ` [PATCH v5 10/14] give a type to OP_PHISOURCEs Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-24 23:14 ` [PATCH v5 11/14] give a type to OP_SELs, always Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-24 23:14 ` [PATCH v5 12/14] give a type to OP_SWITCHs Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-24 23:14 ` [PATCH v5 13/14] add doc about sparse's instructions/IR Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-24 23:14 ` [PATCH v5 14/14] add support for wider type in switch-case Luc Van Oostenryck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170324231421.14869-3-luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
    --to=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sparse@chrisli.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox