From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
To: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Christopher Li <sparse@chrisli.org>,
Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 12/25] constexpr: recognize static objects as address constants
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 03:44:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170331014459.9351-13-luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170331014459.9351-1-luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
Introduce support for recognizing address constants created either
- explicitly by referencing a static storage duration object by means
of the unary & operator,
- implicitly by the use of an expression of array or function type.
Initially tag an expression as being an address constant at the primary
expression level, i.e. upon encountering a symbol designating an object of
static storage duration in primary_expression().
Carry the address constant flag over to the *-preop wrapped expression
created by evaluate_symbol_expression().
When dereferencing such a *-preop wrapped expression, make
evaluate_addressof() keep any address constant flag for the unwrapped
expression.
Signed-off-by: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
---
evaluate.c | 3 ++-
expression.c | 8 ++++++++
validation/constexpr-addr-of-static.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 validation/constexpr-addr-of-static.c
diff --git a/evaluate.c b/evaluate.c
index 726ec15d3..c111f6d19 100644
--- a/evaluate.c
+++ b/evaluate.c
@@ -70,9 +70,11 @@ static struct symbol *evaluate_symbol_expression(struct expression *expr)
addr->symbol = sym;
addr->symbol_name = expr->symbol_name;
addr->ctype = &lazy_ptr_ctype; /* Lazy evaluation: we need to do a proper job if somebody does &sym */
+ addr->flags = expr->flags;
expr->type = EXPR_PREOP;
expr->op = '*';
expr->unop = addr;
+ expr->flags = CEF_NONE;
/* The type of a symbol is the symbol itself! */
expr->ctype = sym;
@@ -1689,7 +1691,6 @@ static struct symbol *evaluate_addressof(struct expression *expr)
}
ctype = op->ctype;
*expr = *op->unop;
- expr->flags = CEF_NONE;
if (expr->type == EXPR_SYMBOL) {
struct symbol *sym = expr->symbol;
diff --git a/expression.c b/expression.c
index 7f1eff306..00edd1f99 100644
--- a/expression.c
+++ b/expression.c
@@ -435,6 +435,14 @@ struct token *primary_expression(struct token *token, struct expression **tree)
}
expr->symbol_name = token->ident;
expr->symbol = sym;
+
+ /*
+ * A pointer to an lvalue designating a static storage
+ * duration object is an address constant [6.6(9)].
+ */
+ if (sym && (sym->ctype.modifiers & (MOD_TOPLEVEL | MOD_STATIC)))
+ expr->flags = CEF_ADDR;
+
token = next;
break;
}
diff --git a/validation/constexpr-addr-of-static.c b/validation/constexpr-addr-of-static.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..a3af99ae7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/validation/constexpr-addr-of-static.c
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+static int a = 1;
+static int b[2] = {1, 1};
+static void c(void) {}
+
+static int *d = &a; // OK
+static int *e = d; // KO
+static int *f = b; // OK
+
+static void (*g)(void) = c; // OK
+static void (*h)(void) = &c; // OK
+
+static int *i = &*&a; // OK
+static int *j = &*b; // OK
+static int *k = &*d; // KO
+
+
+static void l(void) {
+ int a = 1;
+ static int *b = &a; // KO
+}
+
+static void m(void) {
+ static int a = 1;
+ static int *b = &a; // OK
+}
+
+/*
+ * check-name: address of static object constness verification.
+ * check-command: sparse -Wconstexpr-not-const $file
+ *
+ * check-error-start
+constexpr-addr-of-static.c:6:17: warning: non-constant initializer for static object
+constexpr-addr-of-static.c:14:19: warning: non-constant initializer for static object
+constexpr-addr-of-static.c:19:26: warning: non-constant initializer for static object
+ * check-error-end
+ */
--
2.12.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-31 1:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-31 1:44 [PATCH v4 00/25] improve constexpr handling Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-31 1:44 ` [PATCH v4 01/25] constexpr: introduce additional expression constness tracking flags Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-31 1:44 ` [PATCH v4 02/25] constexpr: init flags at expression allocation Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-31 1:44 ` [PATCH v4 03/25] constexpr: examine constness of casts at evaluation only Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-31 1:44 ` [PATCH v4 04/25] constexpr: examine constness of binops and alike " Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-31 1:44 ` [PATCH v4 05/25] constexpr: examine constness of preops " Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-31 1:44 ` [PATCH v4 06/25] constexpr: examine constness of conditionals " Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-31 1:44 ` [PATCH v4 07/25] constexpr: add support for tagging arithmetic constant expressions Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-31 1:44 ` [PATCH v4 08/25] constexpr: add support for tagging address constants Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-31 1:44 ` [PATCH v4 09/25] constexpr: rename handle_simple_initializer() to handle_initializer() Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-31 1:44 ` [PATCH v4 10/25] constexpr: collect storage modifiers of initializers Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-31 1:44 ` [PATCH v4 11/25] constexpr: check static storage duration objects' intializers' constness Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-31 1:44 ` Luc Van Oostenryck [this message]
2017-03-31 1:44 ` [PATCH v4 13/25] constexpr: recognize address constants created through casts Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-31 1:44 ` [PATCH v4 14/25] constexpr: recognize address constants created through pointer arithmetic Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-31 1:44 ` [PATCH v4 15/25] constexpr: recognize members of static compound objects as address constants Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-31 1:44 ` [PATCH v4 16/25] constexpr: recognize string literals " Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-31 1:44 ` [PATCH v4 17/25] constexpr: recognize references to labels " Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-31 1:44 ` [PATCH v4 18/25] constexpr: examine constness of __builtin_offsetof at evaluation only Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-31 1:44 ` [PATCH v4 19/25] constexpr: flag builtins constant_p, safe_p and warning as constexprs Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-31 1:44 ` [PATCH v4 20/25] constexpr: relax some constant expression rules for pointer expressions Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-31 1:44 ` [PATCH v4 21/25] constexpr: support compound literals as address constants Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-31 1:44 ` [PATCH v4 22/25] constexpr: treat comparisons between types as integer constexpr Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-31 1:44 ` [PATCH v4 23/25] return an error if too few args Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-31 1:44 ` [PATCH v4 24/25] give default return type in evaluate_call() Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-31 1:44 ` [PATCH v4 25/25] constexpr: flag __builtin_bswap() as constexpr Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-08-10 12:36 ` [PATCH v4 00/25] improve constexpr handling Christopher Li
2017-08-10 22:00 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-08-11 1:24 ` Christopher Li
2017-08-11 11:14 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170331014459.9351-13-luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
--to=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicstange@gmail.com \
--cc=sparse@chrisli.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).