From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
To: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] force to 0 expressions which are erroneously non-constant
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 15:31:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170531133123.3105-1-luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com> (raw)
Wher some expression that need to be constant but in fact is not
constant, sparse throw an error and leave the expression as-is.
But some code may make the explicit or implicit assumption that
the expression is constant and use its value, resulting in some
random value, which is not desirable.
One situation where this happen is in code like:
switch (x) {
case <some non-const expression>: ...
In this case, the linearization of the switch/case statement
will unconditionally use the value of the case expression
but the expression has no value.
One way to avoid this would be to add defensive checks each time
a value is retrieved but this is a lot of work and time for no
benefit.
Change this by forcing the expression to be a constant value of 0
just after the error message has been issued.
Signed-off-by: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
---
expand.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/expand.c b/expand.c
index dacee7a76..8ee52cfd5 100644
--- a/expand.c
+++ b/expand.c
@@ -1054,8 +1054,11 @@ static void expand_const_expression(struct expression *expr, const char *where)
{
if (expr) {
expand_expression(expr);
- if (expr->type != EXPR_VALUE)
+ if (expr->type != EXPR_VALUE) {
expression_error(expr, "Expected constant expression in %s", where);
+ expr->type = EXPR_VALUE;
+ expr->value = 0;
+ }
}
}
--
2.13.0
next reply other threads:[~2017-05-31 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-31 13:31 Luc Van Oostenryck [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-08-09 16:41 [PATCH] force to 0 expressions which are erroneously non-constant Luc Van Oostenryck
2020-08-10 5:51 Luc Van Oostenryck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170531133123.3105-1-luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
--to=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).