From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Status of sparse-next
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 00:46:31 +0200
Message-ID: <20170611224629.ak7evynf6lcyorz7@ltop.local>
References: <CACXZuxfeUP6bvDwmYv=O4yR7GXOCDeFPf5Sk-_OdXtE+=uZ1Eg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-sparse-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-wr0-f169.google.com ([209.85.128.169]:33686 "EHLO
        mail-wr0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751912AbdFKWqg (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org>);
        Sun, 11 Jun 2017 18:46:36 -0400
Received: by mail-wr0-f169.google.com with SMTP id v104so78512355wrb.0
        for <linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org>; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 15:46:36 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CACXZuxfeUP6bvDwmYv=O4yR7GXOCDeFPf5Sk-_OdXtE+=uZ1Eg@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-sparse-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org
To: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@majumdar.org.uk>
Cc: Linux-Sparse <linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org>

On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 11:02:40PM +0100, Dibyendu Majumdar wrote:
> Hi
> 
> I was wondering if the sparse-next branch is going to be stable soon.

As far as I know, sparse-next is very stable.
Are you aware of any instability?

But yes, all the LLVM patches I suppose you're interested in
haven't yet made it and sparse-next itself still need to be
promoted to master.

-- Luc Van Oostenryck