From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
To: Christopher Li <sparse@chrisli.org>
Cc: Linux-Sparse <linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: what is cooking in sparse-next-20170805
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 03:52:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170806015253.752xof7o3nnf2gps@ltop.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANeU7Q=PetPO=LujGB9mk6RhzJz9aQivYNgx=_4Eht3XMrPFCA@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 08:42:12AM -0400, Christopher Li wrote:
> Two new series from Luc has been applied.
> - fix: give a type to bad conditionnal expressions
> I confirm the wine source file checking went from 23s to 3.x seconds.
>
> - fix list corruption with recursive remove_usage()
> this replace 7d54acb0d6d4a9dff3c91688b0223cd4c4a6d6ea
> "Let pseudo->users loop on duplicate versin of list"
>
> The kernel compile check shows that has output difference in 3 files
> compare to rc4. I include the diff here. I will dig a bit more which change
> cause it. It seems reasonable enough. There is one context imbalance
> warning was gone. My guess is that the conditional expression patch
> make sparse understand the source code better now.
Yes.
Also the context checking warnings are quite sensitive to
small changes in the optimization (via the merging of BBs).
But then it's just a change in the file:line:pos, like in
the first file here under. The other two are different and
I also think they are due to the cond-expr change.
-- Luc
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-06 1:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-05 12:42 what is cooking in sparse-next-20170805 Christopher Li
2017-08-05 13:51 ` Christopher Li
2017-08-05 13:56 ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2017-08-05 14:19 ` Christopher Li
2017-08-06 1:52 ` Luc Van Oostenryck [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170806015253.752xof7o3nnf2gps@ltop.local \
--to=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sparse@chrisli.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox