From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Compiler Attributes: __fallthrough Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 08:27:01 +0300 Message-ID: <20181022052700.a6v3d6t43kot6yso@mwanda> References: <20181021171414.22674-1-miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com> <20181021182926.GB6683@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Joe Perches Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Miguel Ojeda , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Dilger , Masahiro Yamada , Michal Marek , Steven Rostedt , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Olof Johansson , Konstantin Ryabitsev , "David S . Miller" , Andrey Ryabinin , Kees Cook , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Paul Lawrence , Sandipan Das , Andrey Konovalov List-Id: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 11:52:21AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Sun, 2018-10-21 at 19:29 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:i > > On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 07:14:12PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > > > These are two patches are meant to go on top of the rest of the compiler > > > attributes series on: > > > > > > https://github.com/ojeda/linux/tree/compiler-attributes > > > > > > which will be sent to Greg for the next merge window. > > > > > > Please review them and let me know! (specially if someone is against > > > __fallthrough for some reason :-). > > > > Will this work with all of the static tools that are currently looking > > for the comment instead? > > Does anyone have a list of the static tools that > use comment style fallthrough notations? > It would only be CPPcheck I think. regards, dan carpenter