From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: Extend inline asm syntax with size spec Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 14:16:11 +0100 Message-ID: <20181129131611.GC3070@nazgul.tnic> References: <20181003213100.189959-1-namit@vmware.com> <20181007091805.GA30687@zn.tnic> <20181007132228.GJ29268@gate.crashing.org> <20181008073128.GL29268@gate.crashing.org> <20181009145330.GT29268@gate.crashing.org> <20181129130718.GA3070@nazgul.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Richard Biener Cc: Masahiro Yamada , Segher Boessenkool , Nadav Amit , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , matz@suse.de, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , X86 ML , Sam Ravnborg , Alok Kataria , Christopher Li , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jan Beulich , Josh Poimboeuf , Juergen Gross , Kate Stewart , Kees Cook , linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , Philippe Ombredanne List-Id: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 02:09:25PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > I'd be not opposed to backporting the asm inline support. Even better! :-) > Of course we still have to be happy with it and install the patch ;) > > Are you (kernel folks) happy with asm inline ()? Yes, I think we are: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181031125526.GA13219@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. --