From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/4] barriers: convert a control to a data dependency Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2019 13:00:24 -0800 Message-ID: <20190102210024.GJ6310@bombadil.infradead.org> References: <20190102205715.14054-1-mst@redhat.com> <20190102205715.14054-4-mst@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190102205715.14054-4-mst@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jason Wang , Alan Stern , Andrea Parri , Will Deacon , Peter Zijlstra , Boqun Feng , Nicholas Piggin , David Howells , Jade Alglave , Luc Maranget , "Paul E. McKenney" , Akira Yokosawa , Daniel Lustig , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Jonathan Corbet , Richard Henderson , Ivan Kokshaysky , Matt Turner List-Id: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 03:57:58PM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > @@ -875,6 +893,8 @@ to the CPU containing it. See the section on "Multicopy atomicity" > for more information. > > > + > + > In summary: > > (*) Control dependencies can order prior loads against later stores. Was this hunk intentional?