From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/refcount: add sparse annotations to dec-and-lock functions Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2020 15:55:21 +0300 Message-ID: <20200103125521.GJ3911@kadam> References: <20191226152922.2034-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> <20191228114918.GU2827@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <201912301042.FB806E1133@keescook> <20191230191547.GA1501@zzz.localdomain> <201912301131.2C7C51E8C6@keescook> <20191230233814.2fgmsgtnhruhklnu@ltop.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191230233814.2fgmsgtnhruhklnu@ltop.local> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Luc Van Oostenryck Cc: Kees Cook , Eric Biggers , Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Will Deacon , Elena Reshetova , Thomas Gleixner , Anna-Maria Gleixner , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org I re-wrote Smatch's locking check last month to use the cross function DB. Now Smatch can parse refcount_dec_and_lock() directly without any modifications or annotations. regards, dan carpenter