From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@gmail.com>, linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] dissect: change do_symbol(SYM_FN) to check base_type->stmt != NULL
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 11:32:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200207103207.GA16991@redhat.com> (raw)
examine_fn_arguments() silently degenerates function arguments into
pointers but dissect doesn't do evaluate_symbol_list(), that is why
do_sym_list(type->arguments) can report the bogus definitions.
Test case:
void extf(int MUST_NOT_BE_REPORTED);
typedef void (fptr_t)(int MUST_NOT_BE_REPORTED);
void func1(fptr_t fptr) {}
void func2(typeof(extf) fptr) {}
void func3(void) { typeof(extf) fptr; };
void func4(void (fptr)(int MUST_NOT_BE_REPORTED)) {}
without this patch:
4:6 def func1 void ( ... )
4:12 func1 def fptr void ( ... )
2:23 fptr def MUST_NOT_BE_REPORTED int
5:6 def func2 void ( ... )
5:19 func2 --- extf void ( ... )
5:12 func2 def fptr void ( ... )
1:11 fptr def MUST_NOT_BE_REPORTED int
6:6 def func3 void ( ... )
6:27 func3 --- extf void ( ... )
6:33 func3 def fptr void ( ... )
1:11 fptr def MUST_NOT_BE_REPORTED int
7:6 def func4 void ( ... )
7:12 func4 def fptr void ( ... )
7:24 fptr def MUST_NOT_BE_REPORTED int
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
dissect.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dissect.c b/dissect.c
index 54e11d2..b48cd85 100644
--- a/dissect.c
+++ b/dissect.c
@@ -589,6 +589,7 @@ static inline struct symbol *do_symbol(struct symbol *sym)
{
struct symbol *type = base_type(sym);
struct symbol *dctx = dissect_ctx;
+ struct statement *stmt;
reporter->r_symdef(sym);
@@ -603,12 +604,22 @@ static inline struct symbol *do_symbol(struct symbol *sym)
dissect_ctx = dctx;
break; case SYM_FN:
+ stmt = sym->ctype.modifiers & MOD_INLINE
+ ? type->inline_stmt
+ : type->stmt;
+ if (!stmt)
+ break;
+
+ if (dctx)
+ sparse_error(dctx->pos,
+ "dissect_ctx change %.*s -> %s",
+ dctx->ident->len, dctx->ident->name,
+ show_ident(sym->ident));
+
dissect_ctx = sym;
return_type = base_type(type);
do_sym_list(type->arguments);
- do_statement(U_VOID, sym->ctype.modifiers & MOD_INLINE
- ? type->inline_stmt
- : type->stmt);
+ do_statement(U_VOID, stmt);
dissect_ctx = dctx;
return_type = NULL;
}
--
2.5.0
reply other threads:[~2020-02-07 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200207103207.GA16991@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=gladkov.alexey@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).