From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luc Van Oostenryck Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Sparse v0.6.2-rc1 Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 01:33:11 +0200 Message-ID: <20200615233311.nep5ssmxbkhnrg27@ltop.local> References: <20200613020735.iqb2vd23jpomisbq@ltop.local> <20200614215445.rtfbx23ve57fhlbr@ltop.local> <9fecbef9-12c8-6374-d5cd-914c3b009afa@ramsayjones.plus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37410 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725960AbgFOXdP (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jun 2020 19:33:15 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x531.google.com (mail-ed1-x531.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::531]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4058C061A0E for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 16:33:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x531.google.com with SMTP id o26so12848664edq.0 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 16:33:14 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9fecbef9-12c8-6374-d5cd-914c3b009afa@ramsayjones.plus.com> Sender: linux-sparse-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org To: Ramsay Jones Cc: Linux-Sparse On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:54:46PM +0100, Ramsay Jones wrote: > > > On 15/06/2020 17:38, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 12:37:28AM +0100, Ramsay Jones wrote: > >> I just installed python-sphinx (on LM 19.3 it is the python2 > >> version) to give it a try, and it failed: > >> > >> $ make html > >> Running Sphinx v1.6.7 > > > > This is probably too old (running 3.0 here but IIRC 2.7 or > > 2.8 should be OK). > > I'm not that surprised! I will wait until LM20 which, being based > on Ubuntu 20.04, should hopefully have a sufficiently new version. > > BTW, the on-line version of the v0.6.2 release notes look good to > me now ... except one thing! ;-) > > This part of the release notes: > > * fully propagate declarations downward. > For example, it means that code like: > > static int foo(void); > int foo(void) { return 0; } > > now behaves as expected: foo() is effectively static. > > ... has the two lines of code formatted as a 'filled paragraph'. > > I assume that some 'code-block' marker(s) of some description are > required to format this correctly. Yes, absolutely! I wonder how I didn't saw it. Thanks a lot, -- Luc