linux-sparse.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
To: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] unqual: statement expressions should drop qualifiers
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 22:11:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201118211147.10680-5-luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201118211147.10680-1-luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>

Statement expressions should be subjected to lvalue-conversion
and thus should drop qualifiers.

Fix this by calling unqualify_type() after array-to-pointer
conversion.

Signed-off-by: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
---
 evaluate.c                         | 2 +-
 validation/eval/unqual-stmt-expr.c | 1 -
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/evaluate.c b/evaluate.c
index b6e8477185f4..48ce61f0302d 100644
--- a/evaluate.c
+++ b/evaluate.c
@@ -3950,7 +3950,7 @@ struct symbol *evaluate_statement(struct statement *stmt)
 			return NULL;
 		if (stmt->expression->ctype == &null_ctype)
 			stmt->expression = cast_to(stmt->expression, &ptr_ctype);
-		return degenerate(stmt->expression);
+		return unqualify_type(degenerate(stmt->expression));
 
 	case STMT_COMPOUND: {
 		struct statement *s;
diff --git a/validation/eval/unqual-stmt-expr.c b/validation/eval/unqual-stmt-expr.c
index bac6cb6b197f..280c2fe8e36e 100644
--- a/validation/eval/unqual-stmt-expr.c
+++ b/validation/eval/unqual-stmt-expr.c
@@ -9,5 +9,4 @@ int *foo(volatile int x)
 
 /*
  * check-name: unqual-stmt-expr
- * check-known-to-fail
  */
-- 
2.29.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-11-18 21:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-18 21:11 [PATCH 0/5] fix qualifier dropping Luc Van Oostenryck
2020-11-18 21:11 ` [PATCH 1/5] unqual: add testcases Luc Van Oostenryck
2020-11-18 21:11 ` [PATCH 2/5] unqual: unqualify_type() should check for null ctypes Luc Van Oostenryck
2020-11-18 21:11 ` [PATCH 3/5] unqual: comma expressions should drop qualifiers Luc Van Oostenryck
2020-11-18 21:11 ` Luc Van Oostenryck [this message]
2020-11-18 21:11 ` [PATCH 5/5] unqual: pre- & post-increment/decrement should *not* " Luc Van Oostenryck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201118211147.10680-5-luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
    --to=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).