* [PATCH 0/5] fix qualifier dropping
@ 2020-11-18 21:11 Luc Van Oostenryck
2020-11-18 21:11 ` [PATCH 1/5] unqual: add testcases Luc Van Oostenryck
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Luc Van Oostenryck @ 2020-11-18 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sparse; +Cc: Linus Torvalds, Luc Van Oostenryck
This series fixes missing qualifier dropping in comma and
statement expressions and superfluous qualifier dropping in
increment or decrement expressions.
Luc Van Oostenryck (5):
unqual: add testcases
unqual: unqualify_type() should check for null ctypes
unqual: comma expressions should drop qualifiers
unqual: statement expressions should drop qualifiers
unqual: pre- & post-increment/decrement should *not* drop qualifiers
evaluate.c | 9 +++++----
validation/eval/unqual-comma.c | 12 ++++++++++++
validation/eval/unqual-postop.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
validation/eval/unqual-stmt-expr.c | 12 ++++++++++++
validation/eval/unqual02.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 validation/eval/unqual-comma.c
create mode 100644 validation/eval/unqual-postop.c
create mode 100644 validation/eval/unqual-stmt-expr.c
create mode 100644 validation/eval/unqual02.c
--
2.29.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/5] unqual: add testcases
2020-11-18 21:11 [PATCH 0/5] fix qualifier dropping Luc Van Oostenryck
@ 2020-11-18 21:11 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2020-11-18 21:11 ` [PATCH 2/5] unqual: unqualify_type() should check for null ctypes Luc Van Oostenryck
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Luc Van Oostenryck @ 2020-11-18 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sparse; +Cc: Linus Torvalds, Luc Van Oostenryck
Add some testcases related to qualifier dropping / lvalue conversion.
Signed-off-by: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
---
validation/eval/unqual-comma.c | 13 +++++++++++++
validation/eval/unqual-postop.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
validation/eval/unqual-stmt-expr.c | 13 +++++++++++++
validation/eval/unqual02.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 75 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 validation/eval/unqual-comma.c
create mode 100644 validation/eval/unqual-postop.c
create mode 100644 validation/eval/unqual-stmt-expr.c
create mode 100644 validation/eval/unqual02.c
diff --git a/validation/eval/unqual-comma.c b/validation/eval/unqual-comma.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e06586cd43e3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/validation/eval/unqual-comma.c
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+#define __unqual_typeof(x) typeof(((void)0, (x)))
+
+int *foo(volatile int x);
+int *foo(volatile int x)
+{
+ extern __unqual_typeof(x) y;
+ return &y;
+}
+
+/*
+ * check-name: unqual-comma
+ * check-known-to-fail
+ */
diff --git a/validation/eval/unqual-postop.c b/validation/eval/unqual-postop.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..fb3082dc8836
--- /dev/null
+++ b/validation/eval/unqual-postop.c
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+static void test_volatile(void)
+{
+ volatile int x = 0;
+ int *pp;
+
+ typeof(++x) v1; pp = &v1; // KO
+ typeof(x++) v2; pp = &v2; // KO
+}
+
+/*
+ * check-name: unqual-postop
+ * check-command: sparse -Wno-declaration-after-statement $file
+ * check-known-to-fail
+ *
+ * check-error-start
+eval/unqual-postop.c:6:40: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different modifiers)
+eval/unqual-postop.c:6:40: expected int *pp
+eval/unqual-postop.c:6:40: got int volatile *
+eval/unqual-postop.c:7:40: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different modifiers)
+eval/unqual-postop.c:7:40: expected int *pp
+eval/unqual-postop.c:7:40: got int volatile *
+ * check-error-end
+ */
diff --git a/validation/eval/unqual-stmt-expr.c b/validation/eval/unqual-stmt-expr.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..bac6cb6b197f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/validation/eval/unqual-stmt-expr.c
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+#define __unqual_typeof(x) typeof(({ x; }))
+
+int *foo(volatile int x);
+int *foo(volatile int x)
+{
+ extern __unqual_typeof(x) y;
+ return &y;
+}
+
+/*
+ * check-name: unqual-stmt-expr
+ * check-known-to-fail
+ */
diff --git a/validation/eval/unqual02.c b/validation/eval/unqual02.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..f136cbd50510
--- /dev/null
+++ b/validation/eval/unqual02.c
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+static void test_const(volatile int x)
+{
+ const int x = 0;
+ typeof(1?x:x) i3; i3 = 0; // should be OK
+ typeof(+x) i4; i4 = 0; // should be OK
+ typeof(-x) i5; i5 = 0; // should be OK
+ typeof(!x) i6; i6 = 0; // should be OK
+ typeof(x+x) i7; i7 = 0; // should be OK
+}
+
+static void test_volatile(void)
+{
+ volatile int x = 0;
+ int *pp;
+
+ typeof(1?x:x) i3; pp = &i3; // should be OK
+ typeof(+x) i4; pp = &i4; // should be OK
+ typeof(-x) i5; pp = &i5; // should be OK
+ typeof(!x) i6; pp = &i6; // should be OK
+ typeof(x+x) i7; pp = &i7; // should be OK
+}
+
+/*
+ * check-name: unqual02
+ * check-command: sparse -Wno-declaration-after-statement $file
+ */
--
2.29.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/5] unqual: unqualify_type() should check for null ctypes
2020-11-18 21:11 [PATCH 0/5] fix qualifier dropping Luc Van Oostenryck
2020-11-18 21:11 ` [PATCH 1/5] unqual: add testcases Luc Van Oostenryck
@ 2020-11-18 21:11 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2020-11-18 21:11 ` [PATCH 3/5] unqual: comma expressions should drop qualifiers Luc Van Oostenryck
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Luc Van Oostenryck @ 2020-11-18 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sparse; +Cc: Linus Torvalds, Luc Van Oostenryck
It's possible that the input type is NULL, so add a check for it.
Signed-off-by: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
---
evaluate.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/evaluate.c b/evaluate.c
index c39f9ec73da9..fd84205c7f2c 100644
--- a/evaluate.c
+++ b/evaluate.c
@@ -63,6 +63,8 @@ static inline int valid_subexpr_type(struct expression *expr)
static struct symbol *unqualify_type(struct symbol *ctype)
{
+ if (!ctype)
+ return ctype;
if (ctype->type == SYM_NODE && (ctype->ctype.modifiers & MOD_QUALIFIER)) {
struct symbol *unqual = alloc_symbol(ctype->pos, 0);
--
2.29.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/5] unqual: comma expressions should drop qualifiers
2020-11-18 21:11 [PATCH 0/5] fix qualifier dropping Luc Van Oostenryck
2020-11-18 21:11 ` [PATCH 1/5] unqual: add testcases Luc Van Oostenryck
2020-11-18 21:11 ` [PATCH 2/5] unqual: unqualify_type() should check for null ctypes Luc Van Oostenryck
@ 2020-11-18 21:11 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2020-11-18 21:11 ` [PATCH 4/5] unqual: statement " Luc Van Oostenryck
2020-11-18 21:11 ` [PATCH 5/5] unqual: pre- & post-increment/decrement should *not* " Luc Van Oostenryck
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Luc Van Oostenryck @ 2020-11-18 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sparse; +Cc: Linus Torvalds, Luc Van Oostenryck
Comma expressions should be subjected to lvalue-conversion
and thus should drop qualifiers.
Fix this by calling unqualify_type() after array-to-pointer
conversion.
Signed-off-by: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
---
evaluate.c | 2 +-
validation/eval/unqual-comma.c | 1 -
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/evaluate.c b/evaluate.c
index fd84205c7f2c..b6e8477185f4 100644
--- a/evaluate.c
+++ b/evaluate.c
@@ -1028,7 +1028,7 @@ static struct symbol *evaluate_binop(struct expression *expr)
static struct symbol *evaluate_comma(struct expression *expr)
{
- expr->ctype = degenerate(expr->right);
+ expr->ctype = unqualify_type(degenerate(expr->right));
if (expr->ctype == &null_ctype)
expr->ctype = &ptr_ctype;
expr->flags &= expr->left->flags & expr->right->flags;
diff --git a/validation/eval/unqual-comma.c b/validation/eval/unqual-comma.c
index e06586cd43e3..11546d22348a 100644
--- a/validation/eval/unqual-comma.c
+++ b/validation/eval/unqual-comma.c
@@ -9,5 +9,4 @@ int *foo(volatile int x)
/*
* check-name: unqual-comma
- * check-known-to-fail
*/
--
2.29.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/5] unqual: statement expressions should drop qualifiers
2020-11-18 21:11 [PATCH 0/5] fix qualifier dropping Luc Van Oostenryck
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-18 21:11 ` [PATCH 3/5] unqual: comma expressions should drop qualifiers Luc Van Oostenryck
@ 2020-11-18 21:11 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2020-11-18 21:11 ` [PATCH 5/5] unqual: pre- & post-increment/decrement should *not* " Luc Van Oostenryck
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Luc Van Oostenryck @ 2020-11-18 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sparse; +Cc: Linus Torvalds, Luc Van Oostenryck
Statement expressions should be subjected to lvalue-conversion
and thus should drop qualifiers.
Fix this by calling unqualify_type() after array-to-pointer
conversion.
Signed-off-by: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
---
evaluate.c | 2 +-
validation/eval/unqual-stmt-expr.c | 1 -
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/evaluate.c b/evaluate.c
index b6e8477185f4..48ce61f0302d 100644
--- a/evaluate.c
+++ b/evaluate.c
@@ -3950,7 +3950,7 @@ struct symbol *evaluate_statement(struct statement *stmt)
return NULL;
if (stmt->expression->ctype == &null_ctype)
stmt->expression = cast_to(stmt->expression, &ptr_ctype);
- return degenerate(stmt->expression);
+ return unqualify_type(degenerate(stmt->expression));
case STMT_COMPOUND: {
struct statement *s;
diff --git a/validation/eval/unqual-stmt-expr.c b/validation/eval/unqual-stmt-expr.c
index bac6cb6b197f..280c2fe8e36e 100644
--- a/validation/eval/unqual-stmt-expr.c
+++ b/validation/eval/unqual-stmt-expr.c
@@ -9,5 +9,4 @@ int *foo(volatile int x)
/*
* check-name: unqual-stmt-expr
- * check-known-to-fail
*/
--
2.29.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 5/5] unqual: pre- & post-increment/decrement should *not* drop qualifiers
2020-11-18 21:11 [PATCH 0/5] fix qualifier dropping Luc Van Oostenryck
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-18 21:11 ` [PATCH 4/5] unqual: statement " Luc Van Oostenryck
@ 2020-11-18 21:11 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Luc Van Oostenryck @ 2020-11-18 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sparse; +Cc: Linus Torvalds, Luc Van Oostenryck
Increment and decrement expressions are not subjected to lvalue-conversion
and thus should *not* drop qualifiers.
However, while the lvalue-conversion is not done, the qualifiers
are dropped because the type used for the result is the one returned
by classify_type() which always return the base type.
Fix this by using the type of the operand as the result type.
Signed-off-by: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
---
evaluate.c | 3 +--
validation/eval/unqual-postop.c | 1 -
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/evaluate.c b/evaluate.c
index 48ce61f0302d..8599fcee6875 100644
--- a/evaluate.c
+++ b/evaluate.c
@@ -1935,8 +1935,7 @@ static struct symbol *evaluate_postop(struct expression *expr)
if (multiply) {
evaluate_assign_to(op, op->ctype);
expr->op_value = multiply;
- expr->ctype = ctype;
- return ctype;
+ return expr->ctype = op->ctype;
}
expression_error(expr, "bad argument type for ++/--");
diff --git a/validation/eval/unqual-postop.c b/validation/eval/unqual-postop.c
index fb3082dc8836..48b6be8b8508 100644
--- a/validation/eval/unqual-postop.c
+++ b/validation/eval/unqual-postop.c
@@ -10,7 +10,6 @@ static void test_volatile(void)
/*
* check-name: unqual-postop
* check-command: sparse -Wno-declaration-after-statement $file
- * check-known-to-fail
*
* check-error-start
eval/unqual-postop.c:6:40: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different modifiers)
--
2.29.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-11-18 21:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-11-18 21:11 [PATCH 0/5] fix qualifier dropping Luc Van Oostenryck
2020-11-18 21:11 ` [PATCH 1/5] unqual: add testcases Luc Van Oostenryck
2020-11-18 21:11 ` [PATCH 2/5] unqual: unqualify_type() should check for null ctypes Luc Van Oostenryck
2020-11-18 21:11 ` [PATCH 3/5] unqual: comma expressions should drop qualifiers Luc Van Oostenryck
2020-11-18 21:11 ` [PATCH 4/5] unqual: statement " Luc Van Oostenryck
2020-11-18 21:11 ` [PATCH 5/5] unqual: pre- & post-increment/decrement should *not* " Luc Van Oostenryck
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).