public inbox for linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org,
	Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com>,
	Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/2] compiler.h: add const_true()
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 02:18:32 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241113172939.747686-5-mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241113172939.747686-4-mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>

__builtin_constant_p() is known for not always being able to produce
constant expression [1] which led to the introduction of
__is_constexpr() [2]. Because of its dependency on
__builtin_constant_p(), statically_true() suffers from the same
issues.

For example:

  void foo(int a)
  {
  	 /* fail on GCC */
  	BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(statically_true(a));

  	 /* fail on both clang and GCC */
  	static char arr[statically_true(a) ? 1 : 2];
  }

For the same reasons why __is_constexpr() was created to cover
__builtin_constant_p() edge cases, __is_constexpr() can be used to
resolve statically_true() limitations.

Note that, somehow, GCC is not always able to fold this:

  __is_constexpr(x) && (x)

It is OK in BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO() but not in array declarations nor in
static_assert():

  void bar(int a)
  {
  	/* success */
  	BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(__is_constexpr(a) && (a));

  	/* fail on GCC */
  	static char arr[__is_constexpr(a) && (a) ? 1 : 2];

  	/* fail on GCC */
  	static_assert(__is_constexpr(a) && (a));
  }

Encapsulating the expression in a __builtin_choose_expr() switch
resolves all these failed tests.

Define a new const_true() macro which, by making use of the
__builtin_choose_expr() and __is_constexpr(x) combo, always produces a
constant expression.

It should be noted that statically_true() is the only one able to fold
tautologic expressions in which at least one on the operands is not a
constant expression. For example:

  statically_true(true || var)
  statically_true(var == var)
  statically_true(var * 0 + 1)
  statically_true(!(var * 8 % 4))

always evaluates to true, whereas all of these would be false under
const_true() if var is not a constant expression [3].

For this reason, usage of const_true() be should the exception.
Reflect in the documentation that const_true() is less powerful and
that statically_true() is the overall preferred solution.

[1] __builtin_constant_p cannot resolve to const when optimizing
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19449

[2] commit 3c8ba0d61d04 ("kernel.h: Retain constant expression output for max()/min()")
Link: https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/3c8ba0d61d04

[3] https://godbolt.org/z/c61PMxqbK

Signed-off-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
---
Above examples, and a bit more:

      https://godbolt.org/z/11xnxfx3P
---
 include/linux/compiler.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/compiler.h b/include/linux/compiler.h
index 4d4e23b6e3e7..f9d660b63765 100644
--- a/include/linux/compiler.h
+++ b/include/linux/compiler.h
@@ -308,6 +308,28 @@ static inline void *offset_to_ptr(const int *off)
  */
 #define statically_true(x) (__builtin_constant_p(x) && (x))
 
+/*
+ * Similar to statically_true() but produces a constant expression
+ *
+ * To be used in conjunction with macros, such as BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(),
+ * which require their input to be a constant expression and for which
+ * statically_true() would otherwise fail.
+ *
+ * This is a trade-off: const_true() requires all its operands to be
+ * compile time constants. Else, it would always returns false even on
+ * the most trivial cases like:
+ *
+ *   true || non_const_var
+ *
+ * On the opposite, statically_true() is able to fold more complex
+ * tautologies and will return true on expressions such as:
+ *
+ *   !(non_const_var * 8 % 4)
+ *
+ * For the general case, statically_true() is better.
+ */
+#define const_true(x) __builtin_choose_expr(__is_constexpr(x), x, false)
+
 /*
  * This is needed in functions which generate the stack canary, see
  * arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c::start_secondary() for an example.
-- 
2.45.2


  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-13 17:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-13 17:18 [PATCH v4 0/2] add const_true() to simplify GENMASK_INPUT_CHECK() Vincent Mailhol
2024-11-13 17:18 ` Vincent Mailhol [this message]
2024-11-13 18:53   ` [PATCH v4 1/2] compiler.h: add const_true() Yury Norov
2024-12-30 18:32     ` Yury Norov
2024-12-31  4:58       ` Vincent Mailhol
2024-11-17 17:42   ` David Laight
2024-11-17 18:00     ` Linus Torvalds
2024-11-17 19:02       ` Linus Torvalds
2024-11-17 19:05       ` David Laight
2024-11-17 19:09         ` Linus Torvalds
2024-11-17 19:23           ` David Laight
2024-11-17 20:12             ` Linus Torvalds
2024-11-17 22:38               ` David Laight
2024-11-17 22:58                 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-11-18  3:22                   ` Vincent Mailhol
2024-11-18  9:27                     ` David Laight
2024-11-18 17:09                     ` Linus Torvalds
2024-11-13 17:18 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] linux/bits.h: simplify GENMASK_INPUT_CHECK() Vincent Mailhol
2024-11-17 17:24   ` David Laight
2024-11-17 19:45     ` David Laight
2024-11-18  1:14       ` Vincent Mailhol
2024-11-18  1:12     ` Vincent Mailhol

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241113172939.747686-5-mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr \
    --to=mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
    --cc=rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox