public inbox for linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
To: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, sparse@chrisli.org
Cc: luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] add variadic format checking
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2026 08:58:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <30d94564-382e-4cfe-b7ae-6fcabf95847b@codethink.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251222160034.96188-1-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>

On 22/12/2025 16:00, Ben Dooks wrote:
> Second version of this, I think mostly sorting the issues
> identified in review.
> 
> This series (which was initially sent back in 2020) adds the
> ability to deal with __attribute__((format) and checking the
> arguments to formatted variadic functions.
> 
> I have been considering adding a -Wformat-linux to this as
> the kernel now has a number of extra formatting options and
> checking the type of these would be useful. An even nicer
> extension would be some way of informing the compiler/sparse
> of these at compile time (but would need to get agreement on
> how to do this with the compilers too)

Having tested on the kernel, there's a couple of issues with
this code, that i've mostly fixed.

Adding kernel type checking didn't come up with anything on
my riscv build other than a few signed v unsigned.

> Ben Dooks (4):
>    parse: initial parsing of __attribute__((format))
>    add -Wformat
>    evaluate: check variadic argument types against formatting info
>    tests: add varargs printf format tests
> 
>   Makefile                               |   1 +
>   builtin.c                              |   4 +-
>   evaluate.c                             |  14 +-
>   evaluate.h                             |  10 +-
>   options.c                              |   2 +
>   options.h                              |   1 +
>   parse.c                                |  83 ++++-
>   sparse.1                               |   8 +
>   symbol.h                               |  10 +-
>   validation/varargs-format-addrspace1.c |  36 ++
>   validation/varargs-format-bad.c        |  18 +
>   validation/varargs-format-checking.c   |  21 ++
>   validation/varargs-format-position.c   |  32 ++
>   validation/varargs-format-prefix.c     |  19 +
>   validation/varargs-format-tests.c      |  55 +++
>   validation/varargs-type-formattest.c   | 117 +++++++
>   verify-format.c                        | 460 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   verify-format.h                        |   6 +
>   18 files changed, 887 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>   create mode 100644 validation/varargs-format-addrspace1.c
>   create mode 100644 validation/varargs-format-bad.c
>   create mode 100644 validation/varargs-format-checking.c
>   create mode 100644 validation/varargs-format-position.c
>   create mode 100644 validation/varargs-format-prefix.c
>   create mode 100644 validation/varargs-format-tests.c
>   create mode 100644 validation/varargs-type-formattest.c
>   create mode 100644 verify-format.c
>   create mode 100644 verify-format.h
> 


-- 
Ben Dooks				http://www.codethink.co.uk/
Senior Engineer				Codethink - Providing Genius

https://www.codethink.co.uk/privacy.html

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-01-05  8:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-22 16:00 [PATCH v2 0/4] add variadic format checking Ben Dooks
2025-12-22 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] parse: initial parsing of __attribute__((format)) Ben Dooks
2025-12-22 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] add -Wformat Ben Dooks
2025-12-22 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] evaluate: check variadic argument types against formatting info Ben Dooks
2025-12-22 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] tests: add varargs printf format tests Ben Dooks
2026-01-05  8:58 ` Ben Dooks [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=30d94564-382e-4cfe-b7ae-6fcabf95847b@codethink.co.uk \
    --to=ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
    --cc=sparse@chrisli.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox