From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Josh Triplett Subject: Re: [PATCH] dissect: cleanup report_implicit() Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 20:01:36 -0800 Message-ID: <45DE6720.3040005@freedesktop.org> References: <20061214213740.GC422@tv-sign.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE6BFF7B7A1ADA34C01447EED" Return-path: Received: from [69.17.117.4] ([69.17.117.4]:35780 "EHLO mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750817AbXBWEC2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Feb 2007 23:02:28 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20061214213740.GC422@tv-sign.ru> Sender: linux-sparse-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Christopher Li , linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE6BFF7B7A1ADA34C01447EED Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Oleg Nesterov wrote: > It doesn't make sense to do report_implicit() for the anonymous structu= res, > check "type->ident !=3D NULL". >=20 > Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov Applied. - Josh Triplett --------------enigE6BFF7B7A1ADA34C01447EED Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF3mcgGJuZRtD+evsRAkO6AKC3sfUJAFrItd7kMlSqxR+JQjpUFACgllh6 l9meqqrctR1Y8yrDbW/dFjg= =Im4+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE6BFF7B7A1ADA34C01447EED--