linux-sparse.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Triplett <josh@freedesktop.org>
To: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Subject: sparse -Wptr-subtraction-blows: still needed?
Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 14:08:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4637AC3D.6000008@freedesktop.org> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 931 bytes --]


Sparse has a warning -Wptr-subtraction-blows (off by default) which generates
a warning for any pointer subtractions.  This warning relates to GCC
shortcomings observed in 2005; the original log message:

> commit 6889bd0f84939675c743229d6fe623513b95e057
> Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@ppc970.osdl.org>
> Date:   Fri Jan 7 15:06:24 2005 -0700
>
>     Add option "-Wptr-subtraction-blows" to warn about expensive
>     pointer subtractions.
>     
>     Not only does it generate bad code (that can often be rewritten
>     to not do that), it also causes gcc to go into horrible contortions,
>     and Al Viro reports that it can make a factor of 2.5 difference in
>     kernel build times to have just a few of these in common header
>     file inline functions.

Does this still apply?  Do current versions of GCC still have this problem?
If not, can the option and warning go away?

- Josh Triplett


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 252 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2007-05-01 21:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-01 21:08 Josh Triplett [this message]
2007-05-01 21:43 ` sparse -Wptr-subtraction-blows: still needed? Linus Torvalds
2007-05-01 23:59   ` Josh Triplett
2007-05-02  0:24     ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-02  0:35       ` Al Viro
2007-05-02 12:02       ` Alan Cox
2007-05-02 13:19         ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-02  0:26     ` Al Viro
2007-05-02  0:02   ` Al Viro
2007-05-02  2:42   ` Dave Jones
2007-05-02 13:03     ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4637AC3D.6000008@freedesktop.org \
    --to=josh@freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).